User talk:TechPolarity

September 2023
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Bishonen &#124; tålk 15:45, 13 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I, as a blog writer, only want to provide potentially useful references for updating dead links, and I have no intention whatsoever of spamming or promoting anything. I hope you understand my intent. Thank you.
 * Please provide a more detailed reason if you wish to continue blocking my account. TechPolarity (talk) 16:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC)


 * If you wish the block to be reviewed by an uninvolved administrator, please follow the instructions above: add the text  at the bottom of this talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Bishonen &#124; tålk 16:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC).
 * Dear Bishonen,
 * Thank you for your prompt response. I want to clarify my intent and address the concerns raised regarding my actions on Wikipedia. I truly have no intention of spamming or promoting anything. My sole purpose is to provide potentially useful references to help update dead links in articles and improve the overall quality of content on Wikipedia.
 * I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia and adhering to its guidelines. If my previous actions were perceived differently, I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding. I am committed to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward.
 * I kindly request that you consider reviewing the block on my account so that I can continue contributing to this valuable resource. If you believe that certain actions or edits of mine were problematic, I would appreciate your guidance on how I can improve and avoid any issues in the future.
 * Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to your response.
 * Sincerely,
 * TechPolarity TechPolarity (talk) 17:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, apparently what I have now told you twice was quite unclear. I'll try one more time: what you want is an uninvolved administrator. A different administrator. Not me, who blocked you. This principle is in the interest of fairness to you: I should not be reviewing my own block, because I might be too fond of it. Here you go again: If you wish the block to be reviewed by an uninvolved administrator, please follow the instructions above: add the text at the bottom of this talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. And I'd advise you to use your own words when you give your reason for being unblocked; there is something pretty disrespectful about using an AI bot to offer a mouthful of clichés. Admins don't like it. Bishonen &#124; tålk 17:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC).
 * I understand the concerns raised regarding my blog. I want to clarify that my blog is relatively new, and I acknowledge that it currently lacks authority or recognition within the online community. All the articles on my blog are written manually, and I take great care to ensure that the content is original and reflects my own writing.
 * I would like to point out that while I use AI to generate images for my blog, the textual content of the articles is entirely my own work. I believe in providing valuable and unique information to readers, and I strive to maintain the highest standards of quality and authenticity in my written content.
 * I recognize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, and I am committed to following these guidelines in all my contributions. I would like to continue contributing to Wikipedia by providing references and improving content quality, without any promotion of my blog or any conflicts of interest.
 * If my previous edits or actions were seen as problematic, I sincerely apologize for any misunderstandings and assure you that I will take guidance to improve my contributions in the future. I respectfully request that my block be reconsidered so that I can continue contributing constructively to Wikipedia.
 * I am willing to refrain from any edits related to my blog and focus solely on improving Wikipedia's content based on the community's guidelines. I appreciate your consideration and guidance in this matter. Thank you for your time and attention. TechPolarity (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC)