User talk:Techlawyer

Welcome!
Hello, Techlawyer, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Clearview AI, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! tedder (talk) 23:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Clearview AI help and advice
I understand that my proposed edit (addition) to the Clearview AI page was deleted/rejected based on conflict of interest and seek you help. First, I have no relationship whatsoever to Clearview AI or any of it officers, directors or shareholders nor am I getting any payment for the edit that I proposed or from Clearview or anyone else. The Clearview AI page references many citations (articles, comments) on Clearview AI but none of those authors quoted or cited have any hands on experience in using Clearview AI in terms of its end user functionality in the hands of a police officer/criminal investigator. As such I believe that the article that I recently published provides readers with exactly what is missing from the Clearview AI page/discussion - and it was simply my objective to reference that article to provide readers with that perspective. If it is not possible to edit the page to reference myself and the published article, an alternative would be to simply list the article under the See Also section? That would at least allow readers to have access to the article as part of the overall discussion of Clearview AI. Would that be acceptable? Techlawyer (talk) 02:35, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Normally, the editors who respond to help me requests are happy to answer questions about how to edit Wikipedia but avoid getting involved in disputes about content. What you have here is both a dispute about content and a misunderstanding of conflict of interest. If there is disagreement between editors about what should be included on a page, that is expected to be hashed out on the talk page of the article in question. Each editor can explain why their version of the article is best and give Wikipedia policy-based arguments for why.
 * In this case, however, there is a bright-line rule about conflict of interest. You should not be adding a link or reference to any page where you are the author of the source being cited. These edits are considered LINKSPAM and can be removed for that reason. It is not that you are being seen as having a connection with the subject of the article. You have a conflict because your interest in having the citation on Wikipedia is, or may be seen to be, in conflict with Wikipedia's goal of creating an encyclopedia.
 * So, while you are not allowed to add the link yourself, you are allowed to bring the link up on the talk page of the article as an edit request so an independent editor can determine whether it is or is not a suitable addition. Edit requests go into a category (just like help requests) and will get attention quite soon (unlike ordinary comments on talk pages that have been known to go for years without a response).  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)