User talk:Technological University of Tajikistan

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Reply to email
Thanks for email. The block was not a mistake. You ignored our username policy and chose a name that implies that you are editing on behalf of an organisation, a fact confirmed by your email to me. The procedure for requesting to be unblocked is explained above. In brief:
 * You can asked to be unblocked if you do not think your current user name is that of an organisation
 * You can ask to be temporarily unblocked so you can chose a new acceptable user name. You will be asked some questions about your intentions if you are unblocked

I've decided to modify your block so that you can open a new account with an acceptable name, since you are correct in saying that your article was not at that stage promotional. Make sure that you
 * provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
 * write in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Avoid weasel words like "famous", "state of the art" etc. Don't just write about the courses.
 * Write in your own words. Don't copy from the university web site or any other page, since that is a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain.

I'm watching this page now so you can respond here if you wish Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:49, 14 April 2015 (UTC)