User talk:Technopat

Grille
Can you explain why you're reverting my edit? Simply reverting without a meaningful edit summary is very rude. Parsecboy (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page
The sources for my edits were the US Census QuickFacts and a few other surveys in the demographics section of the articles. Should I copy that source again or is it better to use a source that discusses the demographics of the cities rather than just listing census data?

Also, is there some way that I can respond on my talk page to make you see my message? I don't know how to do this. 135.180.146.84 (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Thank you for making a report about at Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Just for the record (for future reference): The user, after having received a sufficient number of warnings from other users, including a "may be blocked from editing without further warning" from an admin, continued to removed perfectly valid references, on at least two occasions that I was aware of: (an edit which had been reverted before I could do so and (and one that I reverted). This second edit was made after the page had been protected. That is not, in my humble opinion, mere "unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith". --Technopat (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Revert at Genetic recombination
Hello. Could you explain why you to Genetic recombination, please? Thank you. 47.155.41.201 (talk) 09:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied and apologised. --Technopat (talk) 09:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Closure edit
Don't revert if you don't know what is happening. 24.161.76.18 (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 15:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Anthony Stevens date of the death
Please explain why you reverted my edit about the date of death of Dr. Anthony Stevens?

Don't revert if you don't know what is happening! Иван Куряков (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 07:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry!
Sorry for the sandbox. TYCF (talk) 10:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Elvetham Heath.
Why did you revert the edit when there is no active content dispute or edit war ? Elvetham Heath TYCF (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


 * From Stable version . TYCF (talk) 12:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 12:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


 * It is not a edit war. TYCF (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Technopat, I know there are some unsourced content, but they are there before I started editing. And I don't understand why it is excessive and also, is it too long because of the images ? TYCF (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, can I revert your edit but remove the unsourced content and some photos . TYCF (talk) 13:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 13:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Stop reverting them, I removed the things that you said were not good. TYCF (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you ! TYCF (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Reversions in User talk:HORACE HORACE HORACE
Don't bother. I think reverting their edits is just baiting and feeding them. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 17:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your note. You may have other opinions and experiences. Technopat (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Makes sense. Thanks. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 17:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello ! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Sent by using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Edits
can we please talk? I'm trying to be civil but it feels like your messing with me Wwew345t (talk) 23:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)


 * dont blame me for a edit war that your refusing to stop Wwew345t (talk) 02:29, 22 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 09:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

July 22
sir you need to visit "pakistan army equipment" page there are some informations which are based on unreliable source's, these sources itself using Wikipedia as a source and just copy pasting unreliable information of Wikipedia (uncited).And patriotic people's using these sources to save unreliable information. I researched a lot and try to edit it with reliable sources (india/pakistan army equipment) Page's,but one person still reediting it many times.I am not saying I am completely right that's why I need your help, visit page and make conclusions/edit. Dl ff (talk) 11:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

https://armedforces.eu/land_forces/self_propelled_artillery/M109 https://armedforces.eu/land_forces/rocket_artillery/BM-30_Smerch Dl ff (talk) 13:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Reply (to be continued...). --Technopat (talk) 11:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying,the person who is reediting informations gave source of "armedforces.eu"
 * For your help.
 * Just go on 'see more section'(below in article and before about us section) and click on 'source'and than see what source it's coding in smerch/A-100 MLRS and M109 spg,in this page. (the same source of armedforces.eu he gave)


 * Replied more fully (to be continued...). --Technopat (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks,I was saying the number of M109(self propelled artillery) and A-100(Rocket launchers) are wrong in this page.someone randomly gave random numbers,and other sources who uses Wikipedia as a source also updated their data(based on wiki random numbers) and the same unreliable source people's are citing.I have reliable sources and Numbers of weapons but i don't want to be in the edit war,You test these sources, if you find them reliable, then edit on the basis of them. I think it is at least more reliable than uncited, and random numbers.
 * For A-100(Rocket artillery)
 * Current Random number of launchers - 800+
 * Based on source - 36
 * Sources -
 * 1.https://militaryleak.com/2019/01/09/pakistan-army-inducts-a-100-multiple-rocket-launcher-system-in-artillery-corps/?amp=1
 * 2.https://www.militarytoday.com/artillery/a100.htm
 * 3.https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/a100.htm
 * 4.https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34517
 * For M-109(Self propelled artillery)
 * Current Random number - 785
 * Based on sources - 438
 * Sources
 * 1.https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/in-a-first-pakistan-showcases-nuke-capable-howitzer/articleshow/90416975.cms?from=mdr
 * 2.https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/23-Mar-2022/in-a-first-pakistan-showcases-nuclear-capable-sh-15-howitzer-in-national-day-parade
 * 3.https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_march_2022_global_security_army_industry/pakistan_unveils_its_new_chinese-made_sh-15_155mm_6x6_howitzers_during_national_day_parade.html
 * 4.http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/pakistan-requests-115-m109a5-selfpropelled-howitzers-01645/
 * According to this source number of m109 in pakistani army is 275
 * https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/US/M109_Paladin.php#google_vignette Dl ff (talk) 02:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * For M110(Self propelled artillery)
 * Number 1 and 2 source of M109(previous comment).
 * sh-15(Self propelled artillery)
 * pakistan ordered 236 artillery's but delivery of all systems are not completed,but in page it's mentioned '236-300 artillery's are in service ' if delivery of all systems is not completed than how all artillery's are operational, some system's are delivered but numbers are unknown.
 * Source -
 * 1.https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/chinas-norinco-delivers-sh-15-howitzers-to-pakistan
 * 2.https://www.livemint.com/news/india/china-is-helping-pakistan-army-build-defence-infrastructure-along-loc-officials-11687716143177.html Dl ff (talk) 03:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

July 23
l edited,'pakistan army equipment' page with citation's.You can check all changes,if I made any mistake than correct it. Dl ff (talk) 14:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia sandbox "vandalism"
Hi, this message is regarding that IP editor (35.134.216.96) you recently reported to AIV; the Wikipedia sandbox is literally a place where editors can experiment with editing Wikipedia and find out how things work, make test edits, etc. It even says in most user warning templates to use the sandbox for test/experimental edits. They can make pretty much any kind of edits they want. The only exceptions to this are what it says in the bottom of the sandbox header, "Please DO NOT place promotional, copyrighted, offensive, or libelous content in sandboxes.", so if you do come across sandbox edits that blatantly and strongly go against that, then do go ahead and remove them, and I would write a notice on their talk page telling them not to place promotional, copyright, or libellous content in the sandbox. But the edits I've seen from that IP, just look like normal test edits to me and certainly did not need to be immediately reverted, let alone warned for.

For these reasons, your report at AIV of that IP was declined.

So yeah, just thought I'd let you know it's not really necessary to warn and report users over most kinds of sandbox edits. I would save the time and effort for patrolling over other article edits instead. — AP 499D25  (talk)  04:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 09:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

July 30
User-An asphalt undid cited changes on 'pakistan army equipment page' which was given by (user-Mr khomri),the changes did by Mr khomri includes numbers of artillery's,which was(before mr khomri edited it) uncited,and Randomly put by editors.Also many source's which are present in notes section are dead.The reason why I ask you for help again and again is this - I am not an old or big editor, even if I edit by giving reliable source, still many people revert it without seeing it. It would be better if you solve the problem by visiting this page. Dl ff (talk) 03:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Yadava
Please look at Yadava page & revert to old version. Narayana-Narayana (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)


 * ✅. --Technopat (talk) 15:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Swati Tribe
Why you removed that infobox ? Explain me otherwise I will brought this matter to Noticeboard Khan Of Naral (talk) 08:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 08:20, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Then add yourself. There are thousands of pages on Wikipedia which were similar to this infobox. Same on Jadoon Tribe page but why you people only have problem with Swatis. I added like them. Either remove from every wiki article either left it on our page or add yourself Khan Of Naral (talk) 08:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Replying here: The fact that there are "thousands of pages on Wikipedia" (I'd actually go as far as to say tens of thousands) that do not fully comply with the Manual doesn't mean that you should, knowingly, add to that number. I use the term 'knowingly' since you now have the corresponding link to the Manual in order for you to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive manner. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 08:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This matter should be discussed on Noticeboard as you both are trying to distort history without any reference Khan Of Naral (talk) 10:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

The Rubettes
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Muhammad-Fateh-Shahwad-Hamidshah Samij
Hamidahah Begum Ali Hasan Fateh E-Tabaqat USER769 (talk) 03:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * You see that bit up there at the top of this page, the bit that goes "... if you came here because I undid or reverted your unsourced content, there's really no point bringing it up here. Just cite your references to the article you edited."? Still holds. --Technopat (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Revert on my talk page
Hi Technopat, why did you revert the changes by @MihaiClear? Regards --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 14:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't make vandalism! I'm asking about if you flag the edits made by IPs such as "I'm gay" on pages as vandalism and revert! MihaiClear (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 15:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello! 5 links for vandalism edits! Give me 5! Not too much, not too few! Best wishes, MihaiClear (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 15:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Oops, IPs that makes vandalism! Best wishes, MihaiClear (talk) 15:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Replying here. Sorry, still don't get the point you're making. --Technopat (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok. Closed! MihaiClear (talk) 18:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

So you know, that's ; at this point the DUCKs can probably just be reported straight to AIV. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Emperor Tewodros II page
Hi, the person with the Arabic user name have deleted some of the stuff on the page of Emperor Tewodros. Why did he do so? Suriav6380 (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, the user with the Arabic alphabet is damaging pages of Ethiopian Emperors. Deleting their background and other. This is not the first time I have seen him doing such acts. Suriav6380 (talk) 18:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


 * No comment. --Technopat (talk) 21:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

jasmin
By what right have you manipulated the content, based on falsehoods, permission to delete and malicious manipulation by another user, and approval of it. If this is the policy of wikipedia, it allows users, for example, verified, to do destructive manipulations, what is this policy?! Parmin khosravi (talk) 12:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I've blocked this user for 31 hours. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  13:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi . Thank you for the update and for keeping a lookout. --Technopat (talk) 13:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

jasmin
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Technopat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Parmin khosravi (talk) 13:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * No comment. --Technopat (talk) 13:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

notice from u saying i vandalized the sandbox??
lmao what i just put "hello page clearer" or something dumb like that it isnt vandalizing anything there's nothing there Keo Venzee (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No comment. --Technopat (talk) 19:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

art tatum
Why did you revert my edit inserting the word "accolades"? Is that some kind of vandalism? 174.56.173.38 (talk) 02:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)kolef174.56.173.38 (talk) 02:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Technopat, have fun answering that. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied. --Technopat (talk) 09:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Ανδρέας Μικρούτσικος
Ατεκμηρίωτοι πίνακες 2A02:586:CC37:5935:539:4D3C:88E6:1464 (talk) 11:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No comment. --Technopat (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Scofield
Why do you commandeer the simple additions we make? Why do you care if a horrible photo is edited? Why do you know better than Scofield about himself, his life and career? Why do you remove any post 2007 information? You called him an idiot. He is not. It seems that you are decidedly trying to make him look bad. And much of what you have written is tainted with opinion rather than simple facts. What can we do to get you to back off? 2600:4040:946F:9C00:6CD7:DBB4:B7EC:E182 (talk) 18:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


 * "You called him an idiot." Please note that I am being very, very careful not to lose my cool here, and giving you the benefit of the doubt, but if you continue to lie about my edits I shall request admin intervention. --Technopat (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Vandalism? Me?
I seem to be very confused I don’t seem to understand how u think I vandalized Wikipedia by making a post and talking about Leonardo da Vinci's childhood.Could u possibly tell me how you think I “vandalized” Wikipedia.If so ty.ItsBabytomatoes (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Replied and apologised. --Technopat (talk) 01:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Spanish succession issue of 1789
Hi, back in 2023 you have tagged the article I have written, Spanish succession issue of 1789. Could you please give some most representative samples, so that I could understand what is wrong with it? rgds,  Dd1495 (talk) 06:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)