User talk:Technotopia

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
 Neil N  talk to me  00:40, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of a fortnight for personal attacks and logged-out vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:06, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marmozets (Band) (November 11)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   13:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

July 2014
Your recent editing history at Sega Genesis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. czar ♔   04:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

I don't see you warning McDoobAU93 who has been editwarring and has made 3 reverts in under 24 hours, way to show you are completely unbiased 100% yup yup, no bias from you, you are totally fair and impartial Technotopia (talk) 07:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Reversions of vandalism don't count. As you are aware, the Bradford IP addresses are not here to contribute constructively to the Megadrive Genesis page.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

It is impossible to make constructive edits if you lock the page to stop people improving it, you do not own the article. Suggesting an RfC is not vandalism, blanking of text to remove the RfC on the other hand is... Technotopia (talk) 17:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Sega Genesis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''This has been deemed unconstructive by editors on both sides of the debate, including American editors who favor Mega Drive and British editors who favor Genesis. Enough is enough. Consensus is against you. Let it go. --''  McDoob AU93  17:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Many people my self included abstained from that vote because it was a load of BS tbh, No "British" editors voted in it... it was just a way for American editors to try and own the article which you do not do. Proposing an RfC is to seek out side opinions, not your opinions and is not vandalism... Technotopia (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Talk:Sega Genesis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. RFC's must be neutrally worded Neil N  talk to me 17:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sega/leftpanel. czar ♔   17:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You cannot abstain from a vote then complain about the outcome! Also, your comment of "No "British" editors voted in it..." is incorrect, as I'm a british editor, and support the use of Genesis.  As I've made clear many times on the article talk page - my position is such because the arguments for "Genesis" are generally put forward in a more mature and constructive manner than those for "Megadrive".  Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:39, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
You have blocked. You have been blocked several times in the past due to edit warring and breaking 3RR, so it's for 2 weeks this time. Sergecross73  msg me  17:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Never broke the 3RR and it's funny how i'm the only one who gets warning and banned for edit warring when McDoobAU93 and others are engaged in it too. The impartiallity around here is amazing, I see no bias what so ever... I would appeal but I cba... See you in two weeks when I will bring an RfC, I may even bring an AfD considering the mess the article is... Technotopia (talk) 17:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Are we still talking about Genesis/MegaDrive? The article would be laughed out of AFD in an instant. If this is truly you conception of how things work around here, I'd highly advise that you read up on policy over the duration of your block. Sergecross73   msg me  18:04, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Any deletion nomination for this now featured article should result in a long term block for disruption. --Neil N  talk to me 18:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I've extended the block to one month per Sockpuppet investigations/Technotopia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

You are blocked again, indefinitely, due to continued disruptive editing and block evasion. Sergecross73  msg me  13:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)