User talk:Techtiplib

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Techtiplib, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. INeverCry  21:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your new name would be OK; however we'd like to know your answers to these questions:

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above.

Also, I would very strongly suggest that in the future you do not resort to implicating your contributions to the Foundation's annual fundraising efforts. While that may be the way affairs of governance are conducted in your part of the world, it is most emphatically not how we do it here (indeed, while I am aware you were not intending to refer to me personally, as the admin responding I consider this a personal attack on my integrity. You may even be violating local bribery and anti-corruption laws by doing this; I don't know. Daniel Case (talk) 14:01, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Techtiplib (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Daniel,

Thank you so much for your message!

Here are my answers for your questions: 1- I understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a website directory (or business directory). I usually use information from Wikipedia for my job, any thing I can find here! 2- I understand what is the "conflict of interest". The information given is not consistent with the goal of Wikipedia could lead to affect the operation of Wikipedia purposes. The information that I have given is personal information and influence to Wikipedia. 3- I understand that "an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable"! The information included in a Wikipedia article must be popular and deserve attention, such as: information about famous landmarks, a new tourist destination discovered, or a new term that used wide world, ...

As I've mentioned in previous messages, I donated the complete amount is not a bribe or seek personal gain something, it's just that I want to support Wikipedia grows and so I can find much useful information for their work. I need information from Wikipedia, I need you, you are the best encyclopedia in the world.

Thanks and hope you resolved my account! Techtiplib (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Actually "a new tourist destination" or "a new term that used wide world [sic]" is most definitely not what Wikipedia is about, nor is "popularity" - the definition of notable is much different than that. We're also rather picky about what external links are acceptable  the panda ₯’  11:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)