User talk:Ted slevin

Welcome!
Hello, Ted slevin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Grade II* listed buildings in Lancashire have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use &#123;&#123;ping&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 13:57, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Woodcock Hall
Thanks for your edit and comment about the correct title. I have checked it out, and agree. I have a contact at Historic Britain (a new branch of English heritage dealing with listed buildings), and will let him know. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia (and don't forget to reference all your edits as appropriate). --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The error has been corrected. How's that for a speedy response from EH/HE?  Thanks for bringing it to our attention. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 16:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)