User talk:Tedder/Archive 15

recent "edit war" on article Children's Health Defense
Hello,

This is regarding the edit war that happened on page Children's Health Defense that you locked, in which I was supposedly involved. When I visited the article earlier today, it was misleading. It was vandalized by an IP address 2600:1006:b16d:4808:4404:a83a:c2b5:c0dd, who was promoting anti-vax fringe theories. I initially didn't know that so made 2 edits correcting the page. Then when I looked at the history I realised it was recently vandalised so I reverted the edit and restored the correct version. Before the vandalism by the IP address 2600:1006:b16d:4808:4404:a83a:c2b5:c0dd, similar vandalism was made by a user named "Wendigo10721" two times, which was reverted by other users as seen in the article's history page[|history page], and right before you locked the page the user "Wendigo10721" has again vandalised the page, but since you locked the article I can't revert his edit so please do the same.

Also the user "Wendigo10721" is the one promoting anti-vaxx pseudo-scientific theories, so please look into that user.

I just want to make it clear I wasn't promoting fringe theories, in fact I was doing the opposite by promoting correct scientific info about vaccine safety and efficacy.

Also thank you for locking that page, now random vandals won't be able to promote anti-vaxx Bulls**t. 2409:4042:2E22:26B9:2CE0:962D:CA52:CB8C (talk) 16:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I tried to protect the page in a stable state (see WP:PREFER), but if there are problems, please outline the exact phrases on the talk page. It's only semi-protected, so if there's consensus, any logged-in user can correct it. If there are any logged-in users crossing WP:FRINGE, we can address it after that discussion. tedder (talk) 17:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Now the page is correct as I had reverted the edits made by the vandal promoting discredited anti-vax theories. There is only one wrong info, as that user Wendigo10721 made a change in the short description right before you locked the page, changing the Type from "Pressure group" to "Advocacy group", which is wrong because That group is leading the anti-vax movement, promoting the false, discredited and non-existing link between vaccines and autism and spreading misinfo and promoting conspiracy theories about Covid vaccines. So just revert the edit made by "Wendigo10721" right before you locked the page and the page will be correct.


 * Also please block the user [] and the IP address[] because they are both run by the same person, using Wikipedia to promote anti-vax bulls**t theories.


 * Thank you. 2409:4042:2E13:BF34:A5FA:F80D:DAEC:47C (talk) 05:59, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Take content disputes to the talk page, please. tedder (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * There is no more dispute as I had reverted the edits from the vandal. I rechecked the article and that user promoting anti-vax pseudoscience hasn't made any changes after you locked the page. Everything's fine now that you have locked that page. I do apologies if I've caused any inconvenience to you. 2409:4042:2E13:BF34:8900:B898:A6E5:38D2 (talk) 05:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mapleton Junior/Senior High School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mapleton Junior/Senior High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mapleton Junior/Senior High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EpicPupper 21:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Huh. What happened to (broadly interpreted) "high schools are automatically notable"? At least a redir? Valfontis (talk) 14:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey ! Yeah, that policy has faded away. It's harder to defend when there's no WP:FUTON for some podunk school aside from my little OSAA list and graduation list. I'm sure a redir would work, I just .. have been picking my battles. (also, cc for social reasons) tedder (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Coordinators and help needed
Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you. Sent to project members 13:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Nomination of Intellinetics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intellinetics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Intellinetics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

CCC
It might be better not to use personal names, at least in this point.  DGG ( talk ) 07:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * True, it seems borderline in this case- it isn't really creating a bio of someone. But the article stands without it, I won't object or anything. And hi! tedder (talk) 07:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

You're Invited! Writing Black History of the Pacific Northwest into Wikipedia
On, Friday, February 25, 2022, Oregon State University will be hosting an online editathon focused on Black history of the Pacific Northwest. You can learn more here and/or register here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Portland Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon: March 12, 2022
You are invited! An Art+Feminism Wikipedia edit-a-thon will be held in Portland, Oregon, on March 12, 2022. Learn more here!

Wikipedia is one of the most-visited sites on the internet—and it’s created by people who volunteer their time to write and edit pages. Learn how to edit Wikipedia and be a part of shaping our understanding of our world. In this workshop, volunteer Wikipedia editors will be on hand to train participants on how to get started editing pages and offer ideas for which pages you can pitch in to help improve. Show up at any point during the four hours to get started!

Also: Free burritos!! We will be providing vegan, vegetarian, and meat burritos from food cart Loncheria Las Mayos. Alder Commons has a large, fenced playground. Children are welcome! Some computers will be available to borrow, but if you have a laptop, please bring it to use. We will also be leading an online training for new editors at 11am-12pm PST. Please feel free to join that training if you are not able to show up IRL.

This event is part of the international month of events organized by Art+Feminism, which is building a community of activists committed to closing information gaps related to gender, feminism, and the arts, beginning with Wikipedia. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Norwegian Air DY1933 Iran diversion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norwegian Air DY1933 Iran diversion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Norwegian Air DY1933 Iran diversion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:45, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Tedder. Thank you for creating List of Class D airports in the United States. User:Whoisjohngalt, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 14:38, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Seemed strange it was missing. tedder (talk) 15:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Boxabl
Hey, it seems like you could be an admin, so I am hoping good faith in your edits and that you truly had not seen that the article says this "Workers at Guantánamo Bay did not properly seal the roofs of some of the new single-occupancy tiny homes being assembled, causing rain damage, mold and another delay for the 2020 project.Credit..." sorry in my edit comment I thought you are doing destructive editing but after reviewing your history, I just think you had not seen the above part. Also the part taking more than an hour, also has nothing to do with Boxabl but the way it read, it seems like they were the problem. I really think this type of comments does not belong on a company page 1) because it has nothing to do with the company and it seems to be staff issue 2) We need more than one incident and citation to claim a companies products are defective. Seniorcroc (talk) 23:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I saw your revert and you're right. I'd missed that caption, which made it clear where the "fault" lied. Thanks for following up on it. The page seemed heavy on the promotional side, but you're right, there's nothing else to explain how good or bad the assembly is. tedder (talk) 23:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I had a feeling you had not seen that part. So another issue I see is that you removed the co-founders, which according to their own website include Galiano Tiramani and Kyle Denman. You mentioned some SEC filing, but the consensus should be based on what multiple sources say, not just one. Here are all additional sources that have all 3 people as co-founders:
 * https://www.builderonline.com/design/technology/homes-of-mass-production-q-a-with-boxabls-galiano-tiramani_o
 * https://www.saniflo.com/us/blog/new-modular-dwelling-manufacturer-boxabl-uses-saniflo-rear-discharge-toilets-f-n376
 * https://www.vegaschamber.com/team_members/paolo-tiramani/
 * https://www.therichest.com/rich-powerful/billionaire-elon-musk-living-rented-50k-home/
 * https://www.autoevolution.com/news/elon-musk-loves-the-boxabl-casita-and-so-will-you-boxabl-ceo-talks-to-autoevolution-197587.html
 * https://www.businessinsider.com/boxabl-tiny-homes-shipping-containers-2020-5
 * https://modularhomesource.com/modular-sees-bright-future-for-folding/
 * https://oxstones.com/these-50000-tiny-homes-unfold-out-of-shipping-containers-and-can-be-combined-into-custom-houses/
 * https://startupsavant.com/startup-center/boxabl (I know its a profile and not a valid citations, but still mentions them all 3 as co-founders)
 * https://patents.justia.com/inventor/kyle-denman Multiple patents filed with all 3 Seniorcroc (talk) 02:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Feel free to add it back. I don't know how to weave it in, the son seemed to have come along later, but I couldn't figure it out. Are you connected to Boxabl? tedder (talk) 03:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks. I will fix. No I am not connected. I was looking to buy something similar and doing research, that is how I came along to the page. Seniorcroc (talk) 04:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you
I was hoping clear support for WP:EVENT notability had arrived to the Normandale Park shooting article with your addition (that I reverted), but it was published soon after the shooting. I then reviewed the Ted Wheeler article to try to find somewhere to add the information, but was unsuccessful. But for future reference, e.g. with more of a lasting impact, it may become a way to add the information, and a way to link the shooting article to Wheeler's article. Cheers, Beccaynr (talk) 01:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * For sure- and I agree on your revert, it was SYNTH. I figure it's worth adding things even if it goes to XfD. Certainly it may work in two different paragraphs of Wheeler's article. tedder (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Teleperformance
Why did you add a list a contracts back into the Teleperformance article which are clearly WP:PROMO and indicative of paid editing?  scope_creep Talk  12:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey scope_creep, I was adding those because I was interested in who they do work for- and the locations of their offices/employees. They seem to be motivated to not make a big deal about who their customers are, but that's what makes it interesting- for instance the stuff about Apple, Ring Camera, and Netflix in the controversies section. Their work for UK (GB? Britain?) is interesting, not everything is necessarily a controversy or an advertisement. But I don't care enough to make a big deal of it. tedder (talk) 21:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Tedder. Thank you for your work on Glitterex. User:ThadeusOfNazereth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 01:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * - thanks. I agree, I had to coatrack the refs a little bit for now, but better than the AFD'ed version of the content from 2011! tedder (talk) 03:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hi, Tedder. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion,  because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:F0BD:882E:BDA6:3CDD (talk) 05:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching those- didn't realize it that. tedder (talk) 05:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Glad I could be of assistance, deletion procedures can be a bit confusing, so people get the details a bit wrong all the time, and it is a rather picayune matter when that happens. When in doubt it is usually best to list at the appropriate deletion discussion venue. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:F0BD:882E:BDA6:3CDD (talk) 05:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

user:BerryPie1999 and conflict of interest editing at New Seasons Market
This user has been warned by yourself and by me to not edit this article because of clear COI, and they have continued to do so. - R9tgokunks   ⭕  05:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Eh? Their last edits are in November. Unless there are deleted edits. tedder (talk) 23:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)