User talk:Teddy.Coughlin

INFO REQUIRED
Where did you get the info about the proposed TF6 album from? Or are you just making it up to be a pain in the ass? Sneakglove (talk) 15:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Your contribution to has been determined to contain incorrect information. Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor. Please see Verifiability for more information about this. Thank you. Karrmann 01:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked. --Sable232 14:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Strawberry Flower
Please cite sources for this article. Otherwise, it may be tagged as a candidate for deletion in the near future. Cheers. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 23:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Strawberry Flower's Untitled first studio album
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Strawberry Flower's Untitled first studio album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of Strawberry Flower's Untitled first studio album.  tomasz.  10:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Rebuild of Eva
You cited a release date for Rebuild of Eva in the United States here: Evangelion: 1.0 You Are (Not) Alone. Please add a citation or I will delete the information as I cannot find any such date. Thanks.DrIdiot (talk) 02:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I've deleted the information on release date and distributor - if you can find a citation feel free to add it back. DrIdiot (talk) 03:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Chowder (TV series)
I've reverted your edits on Chowder (TV series). What does the show Shugo Chara! have to do with Chowder? Yng varr  14:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Shugo Chara!
Stop adding unsourced/false English licensing information to this article. There is absolutely no evidence that this show is licensed for any sort of North American distribution, and repeatedly adding unsourced information is grounds for the restriction of editing privileges. —TangentCube, Dialogues 21:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Honto no Jibun US release?
Do you have a reliable source for a US Release for Honto no Jibun? If you cannot provide a reliable source, then it will be deleted. Please see Talk:Honto_no_Jibun. Momusufan (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have deleted your unsourced information. If you have a reliable source, you may readd the information. Momusufan (talk) 20:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Momusufan (talk) 20:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tommy destination
I have nominated Tommy destination, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Tommy destination. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Momusufan (talk) 00:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Tommy destination
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tommy destination, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Tommy destination. Momusufan (talk) 00:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Template removal warning
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Tevildo (talk) 00:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Momusufan (talk) 13:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Possible Sock Puppeteer to other accounts
Your recent additions of unsourced material in Honto no Jibun, and Buono! have a hint that you are using multiple accounts. According to the edit history for this IP you are using Special:Contributions/24.63.6.149 and your account Special:contributions/Teddy.Coughlin. Usage of multiple accounts is prohibited and will lead to your blocking from Wikipedia if you use this account or your account to keep readding unsourced material. Momusufan (talk) 20:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Teddy.Coughlin for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Momusufan (talk) 21:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Honto no Jibun (song)
A tag has been placed on Honto no Jibun (song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Momusufan (talk) 21:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tommy☆angels (group)
A tag has been placed on Tommy☆angels (group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Momusufan (talk) 21:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Honto no Jibun (song)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Honto no Jibun (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Honto no Jibun (song). Momusufan (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism to Koko ni Iruzee!
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Momusufan (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Ayase Haruka (album)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ayase Haruka (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Ayase Haruka (album). Momusufan (talk) 05:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ayase Haruka (album)
I have nominated Ayase Haruka (album), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ayase Haruka (album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Momusufan (talk) 05:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Please explain your vandalism
Can you explain to me why you vandalized here here  and here ? I know it's you using that IP address, so I would come clean about your actions before I report you both to WP:AIV. Momusufan (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Momusufan (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you read your talk page?
Do you even read your user talk page? Because you keep inserting false information and I have caught you vandalising pages as well after you have been warned to stop this nonsense numerous times. If you vandalise or insert false information into any wikipedia article again, you will be reported to WP:AIV to be blocked.

This is also why you got blocked at http://wiki.theppn.org as well, because you continue to do this crap when it is a disruption to the project. Thank you. Momusufan (talk) 21:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Momusufan warned you in January, "This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits." Even though that was apparently your last warning, you keep vandalising and Momusufan keeps warning you. You have been warned enough that we may propose a block. --Staka 02:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kokoro no Tamago
I have nominated Kokoro no Tamago, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Kokoro no Tamago. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Momusufan (talk) 23:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Feburary 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ''Here you go again putting useless information into an article, if you do it again after this only warning, I will report you and you WILL be blocked for a long time. I suggest you stop right now.'' Momusufan (talk) 23:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Adding False Information yet again..
Stop adding False information into articles. All of your edits have been reverted. '''This is the only warning you will receive. If you do it again, you will be blocked from editing wikipedia.''' Momusufan (talk) 15:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tommy february6's third studio album
I have nominated Tommy february6's third studio album, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Tommy february6's third studio album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Momusufan (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Your defiance to my warnings will now cost you...
Thats it, i've had enough of you. You have been reported to be blocked from wikipedia for adding false information and unsourced information when I have told you countless times to stop this crap.

also, your IP address has been reported as well, I expect you to be blocked very shortly. Momusufan (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Your Nonsense editing
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you Insert false information into Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Momusufan (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ai no Uta (Album)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ai no Uta (Album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Ai no Uta (Album). Thank you. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  15:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tane No Uta
I have nominated Tane No Uta, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Tane No Uta. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Momusufan (talk) 05:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Strawberry Flower
An article that you have been involved in editing, Strawberry Flower, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Strawberry Flower. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Twenty-first Single
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Twenty-first Single, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  tomasz.  21:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Verifiability
This is to inform you that Wikipeida cannot accept information that cannot be verified through reliable sources. Currently, there has been no announcement of an English language adaptation of Shugo Chara or any announcements that it will air on Cartoon Network. Therefore, your additions have been reverted. Thank you. --Farix (Talk) 21:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ayumi Hamasaki's forthcoming single
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ayumi Hamasaki's forthcoming single, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J.delanoy gabs adds 13:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ayumi Hamasaki's forthcoming single
I have nominated Ayumi Hamasaki's forthcoming single, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ayumi Hamasaki's forthcoming single. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J.delanoy gabs adds 23:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove AFD notices from articles. While you are welcome to improve the article and give your opinion on the AFD discussion page, the AFD notice may not be removed until the discussion is closed. Cheers! J.delanoy gabs adds  14:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It is not a speedy deletion tag. It is a notification of an open discussion that is going on to decide whether the article should be deleted or not. No one, except the administrator who closes the AFD discussion, is allowed to remove the notification from the article. You are allowed to improve the article, and you are allowed to give your thoughts on the AFD discussion page, but do not remove the notification from the article. If you remove the tag again, you will be treated as a vandal. J.delanoy gabs adds  17:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Blackout (Britney Spears album)
Unless you can reference a reliable source that can be verified (SEE: Wikipedia:Verifiability, which is policy, says that attribution is required for direct quotes and for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged. Any material that is challenged, and for which no source is provided within a reasonable time (or immediately if it's about a living person), may be removed by any editor) please refrain from making edits to pages based on rumours and speculation. 71.141.114.187 (talk) 19:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Adding unsourced and unverifiable information to Shugo Chara!
Please do not add unsourced rumors or verifiable information as you did with Shugo Chara!. Your edits have been reverted. --Farix (Talk) 18:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yuna Ito's Third Studio Album
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yuna Ito's Third Studio Album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dontyoudare (talk) 06:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yuna Ito's Third Studio Album
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yuna Ito's Third Studio Album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dontyoudare (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Jpoelma13 (talk) 19:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Daihatsu Move Latte
Please improve the Move Latte article if you are going to revert the merge. It currently does not meet several of wikipedias policies and criteria for inclusion. -Sykko- (talk to me) 19:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|left|48px|]]
 * Teddy, please stop removing the tags on the article until you have addressed the problems. -Sykko- (talk to me) 03:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing.

I can't improve the article myself. So, can you help me please? Teddy.Coughlin (talk) 12:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you again remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you will be blocked from editing.

Personally I am not interested in the article, and think it should be merged, but have noticed that you are doing some things to expand the article wich is a good thing.

but you MUST assert why this special trim version of the car is notable and you MUST give inline citations to make it possible for a reader to be able to verify that claim or any other claims in the article. -Sykko- (talk to me) 16:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text Teddy.Coughlin (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I am confused. Did teddy get blocked, or is he blocking himself? -Sykko- (talk to me) 19:11, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

A proposition for a truce and peace
I have been thinking the last few days about how if an administrator were to find out what the 2 of us have been up to we would both be banned. So I wanted to come up with a possible solution so that doesn't happen to either of us because I don't want to be banned and I figure you don't either. So here is a suggestion. If you will agree that we should merge all the Dihatsu Move articles I will work very directly with you to improve the central Dihatsu move article. There is enough info on this car that between the two of us we could make it into a great article and really help people who are interested in getting info on this car to learn more about it. Since that is what it is about I hope that you will like this idea.

I feel this really should be a single article. As the car matures eventually there will possibly be proposals from outside editors to split it back into the articles that we would be merging... but for now we could really create a whole and complete article.

My motivation for proposing that we do this. The first is because I really wanna resolve this conflict that you and I have. I have never been in a conflict on Wikipedia before this persistent and so perhaps I have been going about this wrong. The second is because well kinda selfish. I have really wanted to be an integral part of improving an article for a long time now. Currently the Move article is pretty much at start class, but I think between the knowledge that you have about the car and my ability to get information we could improve the article... and the 3rd... well is essentially just for the heck of it. I am not doing anything else on Wikipedia for now and it could perhaps be a good project to work on.

So what do you think? please go ahead and reply on this page as I have your talk page on my watch list and will notice it... but if you feel more comfortable feel free to leave a talkback template :)

I hope that you will like this idea because I think we can do something here, but if not I will understand. -Sykko- (talk to me) 02:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I am eagerly awaiting your reply -Sykko- (talk to me) 04:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. — Realist  2  19:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Leah Dizon
Umm, yes Leah has a baby girl now, but she is MARRIED. So they are legally a husband-wife couple, and it is RIGHT to say that they NOW ARE A FAMILY OF THREE with a new baby. See Nicole Kidman; her personal life/baby is worded the exact same way.

Also, why post and then remove your comment?

I'm reverting anyway.

Your userpage says you are a SOCK PUPPET. Why are you still here? ★ Dasani ★ 20:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Changed it once again. Please stop rewriting the line when it's clearly unnecessary! ★ Dasani ★ 22:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. MS  (Talk | Contributions)  19:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011 film)
I have nominated The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011 film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011 film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Snotty Wong  yak 20:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Iced tea. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 02:04, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Nissan Leaf
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Nissan Leaf. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources. In this particular case the mid-size classification is properly sourced, as the US EPA designated in November 2010 the Leaf as mid-size car due to its interior volume. Because of the contradiction with Nissan's previous classification as a compact car, there is an ongoing discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Automobiles#Nissan_Leaf_compact_or_mid_size? here], so please feel free to participate in resolving how this issue should be handled considering the Leaf is an international car. Thank you.--Mariordo (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Article Incubator/The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011 film)
Article Incubator/The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011 film), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011 film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Article Incubator/The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011 film) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Toyota Venza
I have started a discussion about you recent changes to the Toyota Venza article at talk:Toyota Venza. We welcome your input on the discussion page but please note that further changes to the article without discussion will be considered vandalism. You might also want to read WP:BRD first. Thanks.  Stepho  talk 01:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Namie Amuro, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TJRC (talk) 20:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Changes reverted - Opel / Vauxhall sale agreed but has not yet taken place
Hi there,

Some of your changes to templates relating to General Motors, Opel and Vauxhall have been reverted; please note that while the sale has been agreed, it has not yet taken place, and in addition you haven't supplied any citations. (Which I would not expect to be possible if it hasn't actually been sold yet anyway).

Please don't rush in and jump the gun in your eagerness to add the latest information to articles. Thanks. Ubcule (talk) 15:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion invite
Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 06:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Yanase and Nissan
Most of your edits are really out of scope. Details about Nissan and Yanase dealerships repeated through a series of Renault cars' articles is really pointless.

Your theory about why Nissan had setbacks is really simplistic and it's putting it in an excessively positive light because a) Nissan decline started well before the asset price collapse b) Most of its Japanese rivals fared far better during the period. Most sources I read agree that Nissan problems were due to a combination of both internal (from the company itself) and external factors. If you read the newspapers, you can see Nissan is even today more shaky and problematic that most of its Japanese rivals. In any case, you can include the theory you support in the Nissan article if you cite the source where you got it, but adding it in all Renault cars sold in Japan during the period is out of scope for them. The Laguna sales in that country were almost zero, so two long paras about it are overkill (this isn't the Japanese language Wikipedia). As I said in the edit summary there, the only Renault car that had significative sales there was the Kangoo, but even it probably doesn't need a long commentary about Japanese marketing. Renault doesn't produce cars relevants for the JDM as a Century, so focus is obviously on Western markets, places where the cars are assembled or sales are important. Nissan/Yanase dealership network in Japan isn't more relevant that the Chilean Derco for Renault-badged cars, and we don't even mention the second one. If you are really interested in Japan, you should focus on editing topics relevant to that country, but trying to convert foreign topics into Japanese ones isn't the way to go.

Having said that, you really need to start including edit summaries and citing your sources. Not explaining which are the intentions of your edits and adding (or even re-adding) challenged content without saying where you got it from is completely disruptive. If you continue doing that, I'll assume you're just being disruptive for the sake of it and I'll revert you on sight. Regards. --Urbanoc (talk) 07:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Jason Schwartzman, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Pikmin Dance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pikmin Dance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pikmin Dance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 18:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Strawberry Flower albums
Template:Strawberry Flower albums has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 02:08, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Akihito. IamNotU (talk) 17:20, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Teddy.Coughlin, I see you've been an editor for more than twelve years, so you really should know better than to change the date of the accession of Emperor Akihito, in multiple articles, without any reliable source. This information has been in his article since 2003 - did you think that nobody ever checked it this whole time? Your change was incorrect, I've reverted it and added two citations. I gave you a level-four warning above, because I see that you've already received numerous warnings in the past about improperly cited changes. Please try to be more careful about it, thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

November 2021
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Top Gun. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Top Gun: Maverick, you may be blocked from editing. Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 18:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Censorship in music
I removed what you added because it does not fit the article. This article is about the actual censorship of music, not the removal and replacement of members of a music group due to matters involving them. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Tikki Tikki Tembo
Hello. As I wrote in the edit note of my previous revert, the source Bailey1948 does not mention about "Long-Name-No-Can-Say", it does not say it was "necessary to change" "Long-Name-No-Can-Say"'s setting, and it does not say that the author of "Long-Name-No-Can-Say" did change the setting from something else. Please do not re-add such unsourced statements; see No original research. Wotheina (talk) 19:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * p.s. Another problem in your re-addition: "Long-Name-No-Can-Say" was released on October 17, 1941, which is before the Pacific War, so the Pacific War could never influence the production of "Long-Name-No-Can-Say". --Wotheina (talk) 20:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)