User talk:Tedmike

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:04, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Indiscriminate crew listings
Hi there, re: this, it would be appreciated if you'd please avoid adding indiscriminate crew lists to articles at Wikipedia. Wikipedia does not endeavor to replace IMDb. Typically only noteworthy crew are mentioned in articles, and anyone beyond the usual few (producer, director, executive producers, writers, and so forth) would need to be supported by prose. Like, if a costumer was noteworthy because they'd received a major award for costuming, we'd provide the context with the mention, not just use a skeletal list. Thank you for understanding. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Oh, and one additional thing, you should only mark edits as minor if they are cosmetic changes like typo fixes, punctuation fixes, adding wikilinks and things of that nature. These are not minor edits:. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Sesame Street: 25 Wonderful Years
Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Tedmike, thanks for creating Sesame Street: 25 Wonderful Years!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Jay Sarbry, Bob Bransford, Ken Champin
Please add a source. IMDb isn't considered to be reliable.Xx236 (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Oliver Callahan is also an orphan.Xx236 (talk) 14:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Please create pages based on reliable sources
IMDb isn't a source. Xx236 (talk) 14:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Adding to this: See Citing IMDb. Articles on an subject should be based on reliable, third party sources, not easily-changeable user-created databases. Subjects sourced solely to IMDB may not satisfy WP:GNG notability guidelines. --Animalparty! (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jay Sarbry


The article Jay Sarbry has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no source except imdb. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be starterd from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oliver Callahan


The article Oliver Callahan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no sources, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically named as an unreliable source at WP:RS. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be started from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bob Bransford


The article Bob Bransford has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no sources, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically named as an unreliable source at WP:RS. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be started from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ruth Kissane


The article Ruth Kissane has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no sources, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically named as an unreliable source at WP:RS. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be started from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Spencer Peel


The article Spencer Peel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no sources, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically named as an unreliable source at WP:RS. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be started from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Singer (animator)


The article George Singer (animator) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no sources, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically named as an unreliable source at WP:RS. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be started from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Russ von Neida


The article Russ von Neida has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no sources, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically named as an unreliable source at WP:RS. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be started from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bob Carlson


The article Bob Carlson has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no sources, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically named as an unreliable source at WP:RS. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be started from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ken Champin


The article Ken Champin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no sources, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically named as an unreliable source at WP:RS. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be started from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Herman Cohen (animator)


The article Herman Cohen (animator) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG; blp with no sources, just an external link to imdb, which is specifically named as an unreliable source at WP:RS. So little info (and all unverified by a reliable source), that if he is found notable, this would need to be started from scratch anyway."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:54, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Pancho's Hideaway (cartoon) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pancho's Hideaway (cartoon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pancho's Hideaway (cartoon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Tedmike, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Bring Me the Head of Charlie Brown have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Best of Elmo


The article The Best of Elmo has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2017"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  14:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)