User talk:Tedmosby83

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Tedmosby83! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 03:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Andrew Chignell -

Proposed deletion of Leonard Halladay


The article Leonard Halladay has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable grad student, fails wp:prof

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leonard Halladay


Hello Tedmosby83. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Leonard Halladay".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Christians in science and technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Robinson ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Christians_in_science_and_technology check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Christians_in_science_and_technology?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Capitalization on List of Christians in science and technology
Regarding capitalization on List of Christians in science and technology: Please see wp:Manual of Style/Capital letters I don't think that "Emeritus Director" or "Professor of Psychiatrist" are proper names and should not be capitalized. Any more than "road worker" would be. Please use sentence capitalization otherwise. Thank you 2606:6000:CB87:F400:7021:6EE9:5408:91A8 (talk) 00:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Specific job titles are capitalized on CVs and the university websites, therefore I think it's appropriate. "A Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences" should be "a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences" but "Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences" should remain as is because it is an official title. But it's not a big deal to remove the caps.

December 2018
Hello, I'm JC7V7DC5768. I noticed that in this edit to Bipolar disorder, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JC7V (talk) 05:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

List of Christians in science and technology
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to List of Christians in science and technology. Thank you. In particular, all claims that a person has a specific religious belief must have a published sources giving a specific attestation of religious belief by that person. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

What kind of evidence are you looking for exactly? Paul Ewart is the president of Christians In Science for crying out loud. Joan Centrella is a member of the America Scientific Affiliation, you must be a Christian to be a member. Plus all of the talks she's done, and writing a chapter in a book that only Christians participated in, ABOUT being a Christisn and a scientist. Want more sources? I'll get more. Tedmosby83 (talk) 09:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I am looking for text and sources, explicitly included within the articles themselves, that both include a personal statement of faith and show that their religion is relevant to their notability. As we always require for statements about the religion of living people. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)