User talk:Tedyand

September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Giorgia Meloni, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 20:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Unjustified reversion. Multiple reliable sources describe this party as far-right. Deleting it is vandalism and indicates clear political bias Tedyand (talk) 20:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I've warned you. Read WP:BRD and stop edit warring. Vacant0 (talk) 21:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an OPTIONAl method of seeking consensus. This process IS NOT mandated by Wikipedia policy Tedyand (talk) 21:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Brothers of Italy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Yakme (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an OPTIONAL method of seeking consensus. This process IS NOT mandated by Wikipedia policy Tedyand (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
 You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC) I've only blocked you from articles, so you may discuss on the talk pages of the articles you're edit warring on. In the future please discuss rather than going immediately to reverting to your preferred version, especially on contentious articles. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Tedyand! Your additions to Human rights in Qatar have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 21:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 21:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)