User talk:Tegiap

Hi,

You seem to know a lot about the theory of cognitive developement, specifically, post-formal stages and their abstractions. Your contributions to the article have been really interesting....

Could you suggest any reading on this? I am unaffiliated with a university, so obtaining a research journal might be hard. I am extremely interested in the more abstract theory of cognitive stages and want to learn more.... --Hypergeometric2F1(a,b,c,x) (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Answer: I think I can only suggest (1) the references listed in the two 'PsyArXiv' papers by Traill; and (2) Some of the writings of Juan Pascual-Leone. This approach is more-or-less virgin territory, so there's not a lot written directly about it yet. New participants would help cure that -- especially if they go further into the biochem aspects. Tegiap (talk) 05:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your recent edit to knowledge I think this material is valuable, but the style is a commentary on the article, not a part of the article. I also think its too long and should not be the first item. I think it would be a lot better if you edited it hence my comment here, rather than going directly to the page. --Snowded (talk) 21:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * thanks for making the chances.  I have moved the addition to the end (but made it clear that the article is about philosophy in the main). --Snowded (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

non-coding RNA additions
Hi,

Thanks for your input into non-coding RNA. I have a few comments on the sections you have included, I hope you can have a look at incorporating these comments:


 * Title for section is very long and not very much in the wikipedia style.


 * I disagree with the following sentence:

Brannan et al. (1990) first raised the possibility that (in one case) ncRNA was not necessarily "junk".

This is not the case. It has been known since at least the 1950s that non-coding RNAs have important functional roles in the cell and are not junk. tRNA and rRNA are the most obvious cases.


 * The section for roles as regulators does not really convey much in the way of content. Perhaps we need a new section on functional roles of non-coding RNAs.  CUrrently the table seems to fulfill this role.


 * The final section on the possible role of RNA as an encoding for memory seems quite speculative. The evidence is not very strong for this.  Therefore it doesn't seem like it should be so prominent in the article.

Anyway don't mean to be negative. Thanks for the contribution.

Alexbateman (talk) 08:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Cohn 1904
Thanks for including an English translation of Cohn's papers. However, the second paper ("Antikritisches zu Hrn. W.Wiens „Differentialgleichungen der Elektrodynamik für bewegte Körper") consists only of one page without important information. Therefor I move that reference up to Cohn 1902. Much more important for the development of special relativity was the following paper: You can download them from Google books. Maybe there exists an English translation of them too? Regards, --D.H (talk) 07:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Cohn, Emil (1904), "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Systeme", Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: 1294–1303, 1404-1416

Invitation
Thank you for contributing to our articles. If you are interested in making more contributions on cell biology and biochemistry topics, you might want to join the Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject (signup here). You will be most welcome. - Tim Vickers (talk) 15:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Piaget's theory of cognitive development, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mattick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Meta-epistemology
You may not be aware that User:Snowded has engaged a Deletion request for the article meta-epistemology, which you had a part in creating. Perhaps you would be interested to take a look? Brews ohare (talk) 14:11, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=699796171 your edit] to Neural Darwinism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neural Darwinism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Digit, Piaget and Analogue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your edits
Hi, I just noticed your edit on the Kant article, which was adding some references to a self-published source (deprecated at WP:RSP). I reverted it. I also noticed that most of your edits are only adding self-published references from a single author. These should all be replaced by a reliable source actually. Mvbaron (talk) 15:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvbaron (talk • contribs) 16:25, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Piaget's theory of cognitive development, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Popper. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)


 * OK, I may well get round to fixing this ref to K.R.Popper (1934) Tegiap (talk) 15:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)