User talk:TehBrandon/archive

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed nobody had said hi yet... Hi!

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the  link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

You might like some of these links and tips:
 * some General guidance.
 * Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
 * Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
 * Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).
 * Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
 * Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
 * Use the Show preview button
 * Provide an Edit summary
 * Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
 * Take a look at Consensus of standards
 * Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing!-- Alf melmac 23:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

My Usertalk page
Thank you for reverting the vandlism on my talkpage. DXRAW 01:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * ''PS; Just a wee word of advice, using edit summaries which call people names like "dick" or "retard" may encourage the vandals, and also breaches WP:NPA - I know they are vandals, but we all have to stay in line with policy. Otherwise keep up the great work! Gl e n 00:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, sometimes I just get a worked up, Thanks!

Chemical compound.
Hi, I saw you did a reverting edit on chemical compound, but in that way you reinstated the wrong version, actually removing a part of the text, and introducing some vandalism. I guess you clicked the wrong edit button and saved. I have repaired it now. See you around. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, sorry about that and thanks for letting me know! TehBrandon 21:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

non admin rollback and warning tools
I have added these for you (per your IRC request). Can you please clear your cache (hit CTRL-R) and then when you see some vandalism use the  RED  revert link. This should open the vandals talk page and you should see an extra tab at the top next to history - see if that works :) Let me know if you like! Gl e n 13:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Noticed your editing your monobook - all okay? Gl e n 17:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I thought it wasn't working before I cleared my cache :P Thanks very much!

List of sex positions
AntiVandalBot reverted to the wrong version...check the page history. No harm, no foul though. OscarTheCat3 23:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Come fly with us

 * —— Eagle (ask me for help) 21:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

erroneous perception of vandalism
a user changed the coding on his/her comments on whether or not to delete the article "political cult" Apparently this person had not known how to put in the bullet and the bold "Keep." Then came back and did it correctly. Why did you delete the person's change and allege vandalism? You should restore the coding and be more careful in the future.--Dking 21:02, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Dear TehBrandon,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that Your edit count is too low. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, TehBrandon! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)