User talk:Tehseenahmad91

WP:NFF
Hi there, I notice you've attempted to create a number of film articles like Ghajini 2 and restore redirected articles like Sholay 2 and Dostana 2. There's a bit of a problem with your edits however. Per WP:NFF:
 * Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun.

So your first job when creating any article for an upcoming film is to demonstrate that principal photography has begun. If you do not do that, as with your restoration of Sholay 2, the article needs to be converted back into a redirect. This is a significant issue, because repeated recreation of these articles without meeting community criteria can look an awful lot like you are proliferating a hoax. Since that is probably not your intention, I need you to please get on board with this as quickly as possible. If you continue to create articles that do not conform to community standards, it will very quickly be considered disruptive. This should be very preventable, however, by 1) proving that the film has begun filming, and 2) providing ample sources in the articles you create. See also our reliable sourcing guidelines. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Please stop creating these pages for sequels who may or may not be in production. The guideline WP::NFF is pretty clear. Best, Pichpich (talk) 15:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Pichpich (talk) 15:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)