User talk:Tejal.johri

Welcome!

 * }

A pie for you!
hi Tejal, please decide a topic and write it on the course page as soon as you can, the last date for submitting the article is october 14th, so hurry up!!! you have already crossed many deadlines. Devanshi tripathi (talk) 19:05, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

deleting the image
{ {speedydelete|Reason} } without the spaces Devanshi tripathi (talk) 17:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Also for viewing how many people are seeing your article, go to view history and then click on view page statistics. Devanshi tripathi (talk) 17:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Online Ambassador
Hello, I am an experienced Wikipedia editor who has volunteered as an online ambassador to assist students editing India Education Program/Courses/Fall 2011/Research Methodology Year 3 Group A articles. Please call on me freely with respect to editing and style questions. I can also address any issues you may encounter with other users confidentially. I live in the United States, MDT, so please be mindful of the time difference, about 12 hours. I am often available on irc in the early morning or late evening. I am available through Wikipedia email and will respond to notes on my talk page. Our experience with mentoring is that users who edit actively and communicate freely with other users often have the best experience, so, if possible, jump right in and actively edit your class assignment and anything else that interests you and feel free to ask me, or any other Wikipedia user, for help. User:Fred Bauder Talk 20:40, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Did you write on my talk pagee?:) Roshnisaigal (talk) 09:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Aww so sweeet :D <3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roshnisaigal (talk • contribs) 12:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Your note
Hi. You are the online ambassador for me. Do take a look at my article, link is there on my user page. I haven't put any references till now, but apart from that, I would really like a feedback from you! Thanks :) Tejal Johri (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It looks good, but as I have never heard of the subject, I would have to see references to even get started. It is much better practice to put references into your work as you develop it. User:Fred Bauder Talk 23:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Picture Upload
hi Tejal, i spoke to other CA's, you need to get permission from the photographer or the owner of the website, obviously thats a little tough, so leave it for now, uploading images is not that imp, concentrate on the content of your article, what you can do is, try searching for the image in commons. Devanshi tripathi (talk) 18:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Feedback on Fei-Ranis Model of Economic Growth
Hi Tejal,

First of all I really like your article and especially the diagrams, it's coming up really well!

Yes, I'm a Campus Ambassador allocated to your class(not Online Ambassador).

I went through your article and have few Suggestions:


 * Shorten the lead section, try to put the jist of the article here instead of putting paragraphs
 * After putting up the lead section put a Introduction section and elaborate about the article
 * Put a brief about the diagram and then start explaining it, it will help readers to create the context
 * Don't make too many lines bold, it pinches readers eyes and might loose the interest
 * Put internal links inside the article for e.g., put MR or Marginal Revenue in square brackets for e.g., Marginal revenue, it will create a link to the existing Wikipedia article and help readers to navigate.
 * Make formulas Bold, and if possible in a single line
 * Add more references
 * Add a Category i.e., which category this article belongs

I'm really impressed with your article and hope that we'll go for "Good Article" after making the required changes.

Keep it up!!

Cheers,

Ram (talk • contribs) 19:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Size of Math tag
Hey Tejal! I'm not sure we can reduce the size of characters within $$$$ tag.

Cheers,

Ram (talk • contribs) 19:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
This is for your contributions to article Fei-Ranis_Model_of_Economic_Growth.

Keep it up!

Cheers,

Ram (talk • contribs) 19:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 

Footer
Hey Tejal! I really liked it, one small suggestion just add a category to it for e.g., economics or which ever category it belongs to.

Great Job!

Cheers,

Ram (talk • contribs) 07:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Feedback

 * 1) Sentences like "Using the help of the figure on the left" do not make sense in case you're using WP on your phone. What if someone edits it and changes the text in such a way that the diagram is on the right? Instead label the figure and refer to it in the text. That's what I did for Robinson Crusoe Economy.
 * 2) "Connectivity between sectors" section has no references! Even the WP:lede doesn't! Put references for every sentence possible.
 * 3) As per WP:MOS you should use italics, not bold to draw attention to certain points.
 * 4) Change firstly, secondly, thirdly, fourthly!! It doesn't flow with the rest of the article. You need not cut it up into these 5 strict blocks. Let it be like 5 different paragraphs. That's why you have a common heading above.
 * 5) Instead of a title like "Evaluation of the model" maybe you can write "reactions". Read wp:Crit
 * 6) All the best, the article looks great otherwise! Love the figures! :-)

Abhilasha369 (talk) 11:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Tejal
Hi Tejal, just saw the footer you put for my article Critical minimum effort theory, thank you so much it looks great !!! Devanshi tripathi (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank u so much for your help (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Partial Theories of Development


A tag has been placed on Partial Theories of Development requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shadowjams (talk) 05:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Welcome
Oh thats great!! remember to sign your posts by typing 4 tildes ~ ~ ~ ~ Devanshi tripathi (talk) 09:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes Ma'am! :) Tejal Johri (talk) 15:29, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Page Statistics
Hey Tejal!

I'm not sure if you are confused with the entries in "View History" link. If that's the issue all I'll say is you need to click on either "older entries" or any of the number, I'll suggest you on 500, which will show you the last 500 edits history.

I hope it works.

Happy Editing :)

Ram (talk • contribs) 14:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

No, I am talking about the article traffic view statistics. The graph shows me the views only for one day before, and shows the views before as zero. I don't know if this is how it appears only from my screen, or whether everyone sees it that way. Do you understand what I am saying? I am not talking about the edits, but the views. Tejal Johri (talk) 17:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey Tejal,
 * Please share the link with me,it will be more helpful.
 * Thanks,
 * Ram (talk • contribs) 20:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Here it is. http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Fei%E2%80%93Ranis_model_of_economic_growth Hope it helps. Tejal Johri (talk) 20:07, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Tejal, It seems there's some problem with Wikipedia servers, and none of the page view counters are working properly. So in short don't worry, I know u might be curious about the page views but we need to be a bit patient for some time.

Cheers,

Ram (talk • contribs) 15:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! :) Tejal Johri (talk) 15:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Ur welcome :)

Ram (talk • contribs) 15:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!
Thank you! :) Tejal Johri (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ritchie333   (talk)  15:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of WorkDrugs (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WorkDrugs (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/WorkDrugs (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rschen7754 23:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Work Drugs concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Work Drugs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Work Drugs


Hello Tejal.johri. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Work Drugs.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 11:03, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)