User talk:Tejaspav/sandbox

I like what you have so far, you explained both dynamic and static stretching very well. I still feel like you could add more though. Maybe try and split it up section by section so the reader can easily fly through it. A picture is always good but I'm sure you are going to put one in. Besides that it looks like your off to a good start, keep putting in that slight work!Jonnybling (talk) 03:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review: 1. First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? 2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? 3. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve this article? 4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
 * I think you defined static and dynamic stretching very well. You gave information about both kinds of stretching and included examples to ensure that the reader is really understanding it.
 * You gave the information in a clear way, but the sentences don't seem to flow very nicely. I would suggest to add more to the sentences and use transition phrases.
 * I would also add more to the article because you don't have a lot of information on anything else.
 * I also think adding a picture or two would benefit the article tremendously.
 * I believe that fixing the issue with length would most improve this article, also citing the work properly will help.
 * I really liked how you listed examples in your article and I think I will do that to my own!

Really good job so far, just keep going with it! --Erikawicher98 (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2016 (UTC) -- this needs an outline and much more work to pass. Ctysick (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2016 (UTC)