User talk:Tejb

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to St. Leo& appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Christina Silverman (talk) 07:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Turgan Talk 07:15, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

My edit to St Leos Catholic College Wahroonga
Dear Turgan, I strongly believe that me attending the school is enough proof for me to add valid information to the article in dipute.

Yours Sincerely, Tejb

All information you add must be verified by a reliable source. Your edits, while made in good faith, violate Wikipedia's policy against original research, and the fact that you attended the school in question may indicate a conflict of interest. Christina Silverman (talk) 07:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I absolutely love to play Call of Duty and Halo. I believe that they are the best games in the world.

My edits to St Leos College
To Turgan and Christina Silverman, Thanks for trying to help but the article in dispute already needed citation and you are not sending the page creator messages and removing their edits. The only people who can prove Mel Gibson attende are teachers and student of the school and I happen to be a student there. You must also remember that I am brand new to Wiki editing and need to grasp the rules so please ease off a bit. I also did not mean to bias my edit at all and I am sorry if my edit has caused any trouble. Tejb (talk) 07:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Its all good. Just make sure to read the policies before editing. Welcome to Wikipedia and happy editing! Christina Silverman (talk) 07:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


 * No worries, we were all there once. Just remember to include verifiable independent sources for anything that could be questioned or is controversial.  Turgan Talk 12:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Adoption
Sure, I'd be happy to adopt you. Need any help, feel free to ask. Swarm Talk 23:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tejb


A tag has been placed on User:Tejb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Highspeedrailguy (talk) 18:03, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tejb


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Tejb, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Highspeedrailguy (talk) 18:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)