User talk:TekkenJinKazama

Done. Welcome to Wikipedia --Stfg (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zeest (band)


A tag has been placed on Zeest (band), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 11:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit semi-protected template
This template is only meant to be used on article talk pages to allow non-auto-confirmed editors to add their changes to a semi-protected article by proxy. I can't tell why you put the template here, but if you need something, you can ask me at my talk page or you can use the help template here to get someone else to come help. Regards, Celestra (talk) 18:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * They seemed to be asking for the user page to be created. I was happy to do it. --Stfg (talk) 18:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
K6ka (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vikas Manaktala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Language of film
Because English is not a main language of Ra.One, it cannot be included in the infobox. As for your main question, Bollywood films are Hindi only films. I know Bollywood films these days have a lot of English dialogues, but they are not publicised as English films and do not even target English-speaking audiences (not until subtitles are added). Therefore do not add English as a language to any Hindi film article until they are publicised as English-also films. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * IMDb is not a reliable source and just like Wikipedia, anyone can edit it. As for Chennai Express, it does have a lot of Tamil, but not enough Tamil to classify it as a Tamil-also film (there is a Tamil dubbed version of the film infact). So remove the secondary language from the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:Darr Ka Blockbuster-picsay.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Darr Ka Blockbuster-picsay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Savdhaan India
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Savdhaan India, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Savdhaan India @ 11. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:


 * 1) a link to the article you copied from
 * 2) the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 05:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chennai Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sri Lankan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Savdhaan India @ 11 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Shaolin Soccer. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Shaolin Soccer, you may be blocked from editing. ''Again, stop assuming that the original release of this film is in English when not one word of English was used in the Cantonese dialogue. Also, English dubs do not count on the original release.'' Areaseven (talk) 05:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Blocking
Hi Jin. If you would like to have me blocked indefinitely, you should understand how and why that is done at WP:BLOCK. BOVINEBOY 2008 15:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Mumbai 125 KM 3D, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BOVINEBOY 2008 15:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User:Bovineboy2008. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. BOVINEBOY 2008 15:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Userpage copy
You have blatantly copied my user page, by adding the same userboxes that I use, including some facts that are not true about you (U did not contribute to even one good article on Wiki, yet ur page says u contributed to 5). I suggest you please rework that portion alone so that people are not misled, nor will they suspect u or me of sockpuppetry. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ra.One. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Ra.One
Quite obviously you'd don't bother to read any advice that others have given to you. I see that once again you're forcing your edit onto Ra.One. Discussion means exactly that - multiple people talking about a proposed edit. You don't care about that from your actions. I can't revert you further without getting deeper in to WP:EDITWAR over this and frankly it's not worth it. I do not and will not support your edit. If you continue along this path, you will end up getting blocked again. STOP. USE THE TALK PAGE. GET CONSENSUS (THAT MEANS AGREEMENT) FROM OTHER EDITORS BEFORE MAKING THE EDIT AGAIN. I making a point here because you are not listening to anyone else. That has gotten you blocked before and will get you blocked again. Think about this. Consider self-reverting your edit. Ravensfire ( talk ) 18:55, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ra.One shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''You have already reverted 4 times in the past 24 hours, that's enough to get you blocked right now for edit-warring. Read the page on the 3RR limit. You have gone past it with your last edit. STOP. USE THE TALK PAGE. DISCUSS.'' Ravensfire ( talk ) 18:56, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2013 - warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ra.One. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''You are continuing to force you change into the article without discussing it on the talk page. Your "source" does not mention English at all. Multiple reliable sources have been provided showing the primary language is Hindi only. English is used in the film, but it's not the primary language which is what that parameter in the infobox lists. If you put English back into the infobox without an agreement supporting it on the talk page, I will take this to the WP:EWN. You aren't listening to what you've been told. You aren't discussing this. I've tried just about everything I can do to push you towards how disputes are handled on Wikipedia but it hasn't helped. You've been blocked over this once. You need to change how you interact with other editors here immediately. '' Ravensfire ( talk ) 20:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. - Vianello (Talk) 04:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for edit warring at Ra.One
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring, as you did at Ra.One. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Shaolin Soccer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''We've discussed this several times already. Shaolin Soccer was produced in Cantonese only. The English dub does not count as the film's main language.'' Areaseven (talk) 12:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Infobox indian TV actor
TekkenJinKazama, I noticed you created a new infobox template for Indian TV actor's and I'm curious as to why it's needed. Actor pages with an infobox use the Infobox person template. There appears to be an Infobox actor template, but if you actually go there you see it's a redirect to the person template. The history on the actor template shows a WP:TFD discussion said to redirect it to the person template. What's needed that isn't supported by the current person template? Ravensfire ( talk ) 16:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Areaseven (talk) 06:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Kazuya Mishima (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Bruce Irvin and Anna Williams


 * Karanvir Bohra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Helen Richardson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated image copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

 * Note - would any admin review this hold off for a bit? I don't think a straight unblock is a viable option at this point.  I would like to start a discussion with the editor (and would like to see some others join in) about issues/problems we see with their editing style and how they plan to address those concerns. Ravensfire ( talk ) 17:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Discussion
Jin, there is quite a bit that you skipped over in your unblock request. You originally edited as and have several blocks on that account for copyright violations from 2010 and 2013. This account has several blocks for edit-warring and was indeffed for copyright violations. In the two months since this account was blocked, you've created at least and evaded the block countless time as an IP editor. During that time, you've used those socks to !vote at AFD discussions multiple times in an attempt to lend your view more weight. You've recreated (often multiple times) articles that were deleted through AFD discussions, including using deliberate misspellings to get around articles that had to be protected or salted because of your actions.

Throughout your time editing, you rarely use the article talk page to discuss edits, even when specifically asked to discuss problem there. Often, you just revert, generally without an edit comment. Sometimes you will post a comment on a specific users page about a specific edit to an article. You have ignored larger consensus decisions, even when you are directed to where that consensus was decided. You've tried to get random admins involved by posting misleading, pleading messages. You've tried to change widely used templates without even trying to discuss the changes. When an article of yours has been taken to WP:AFD, you've deleted the AFD message, redirected the article's AFD page somewhere else, deleted comments from other users and added deceptive comments to the AFD. You've used unreliable sources, even when pointed out that they are unreliable and why.

(Yes, I've skipped linking to specific examples of each issue as there are a lot but none of them are difficult to find)

There's probably more, but at this point it's basically piling on. Most of these can be summarized as you don't care about others. Things will be done your way. Period. The idea that this is a cooperative project is fine, so long as everyone cooperates with you. An example is you created Viraj Dobriyal with one of your early socks. The article was taken to AFD where it was decided to delete the article. You subsequently tried to recreate the article twice. There was a consensus that it was not notable but you didn't care about that. You've also been blocked several times for edit-warring over exact same thing, and yet each time after being unblocked you kept doing the same thing. A few times you did post on the article talk page, but you generally ignored every point made by others. Basically, you said "I'm doing it this way now stop bothering me."

I'm not an admin and will never be one. I try to help editors that I think have some potential but need to change how they are editing. You've been indeffed and there is zero chance any admin would just unblock you. You've continued to edit as an IP, making the exact same edits and created sock after sock after sock. Your actions have been disruptive. You fit perfectly the profile in WP:NOTHERE. Anyone who would consider an unblock is going to ask themself how would this time be any different? Why should you be believed? It's not hard to find your edits and sockpuppet account. The accounts get blocked, new articles get deleted and other edits get reverted. The main reason for you requesting the unblock is because of frustration that you are being stopped from editing. But other than vague comments basically saying "I'll be better this time, promise!", there's nothing to indicate why, or how, you'll be different. So, why and how will you be different this time? Why should anyone believe you this time? You've shown from your actions that you don't care about working with others, why will that change after all of this time? Ravensfire ( talk ) 20:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * : Brother Viraj Dobriyal was a notable character from DSDDSB (show ran from 2011 to 2013). And please listen to me already they accused him as non notable. And i just want my Life back here. I have sources which will prove Dobriyal a notable show character. Brother i just want to be a good person and my rights. TekkenJinKazama (talk) 06:02, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Which pretty much equates to saying, "No, I was right and everyone else was wrong," thus perfectly illustrating the issue Ravensfire has identified. It's clear from your history of sockpuppetry, copyright violations, edit-warring and refusal to accept consensus that working on a communal editing project is not for you, and I am therefore declining your request for an unblock. Yunshui 雲 水 07:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Regretfully, I must agree with Yunshui. Jin, when multiple editors determine (that consensus thing) that something isn't notable, the burden is on you to demonstrate otherwise.  When an article has been deleted through an AFD discussion, you can request the article be copied to your user space where you can work on it.  You can use WP:DRV to have the deletion reviewed, especially if you have new sources to support your case.  You say you want "your rights" back, but those editing privileges come with things you have to do to keep them.  You've broken those rules, and the trust of the community, with your actions.  I spent a fair amount of time outlining to you the problems others and I have seen in your edits.  You leave a four sentence reply ignoring most of the points and, most importantly, the question I asked at the end.  That's extremely disheartening and just drives home the problem here. Ravensfire ( talk ) 14:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Already back socking
- really, Jin? Thank you for reinforcing my view that you don't give a damn about anyone else but you. Don't ever ask or expect my support for you to be unblocked. You are a blocked editor on Wikipedia. Any edits you make as an IP address or as a sock account are block evasion and can be reverted. <b style="color:darkred;">Ravensfire</b> ( talk ) 15:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * @ : Brother RF That what meant to be. Bhai listen release me from jail in Wikipedia i am myself tired by Atama's block gunshots. Bhai just unblock me and i will never come here if i released. At least here help me. This TJK swears of Allah release me & be free too. And admin declined me for what? Block Evasion! I am just here for my unblock! Mr. RF You are only one of my brother here and i do not trust any one. Please brother, release me from my prison of Wikipedia..

TekkenJinKazama (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 SAMI  talk 08:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
<b style="color:darkred;">Ravensfire</b> ( talk ) 13:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Busy, aren't you?
Quite a few edits you've made of late, Jin. Please remember that you are blocked. You. Not the account. You know the only way back for you is to NOT sock or edit as an IP address for 6 months, then apply for WP:OFFER. That six months resets with every sockpuppet account and IP edit you make. Just stop, okay. Wait it out. You screwed up and you've got a price to pay. Ignoring that won't help you out, it just makes it less and less likely that any attempt to return will ever be granted. <b style="color:darkred;">Ravensfire</b> ( talk ) 16:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Nadaniyaan BigMagic.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Nadaniyaan BigMagic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Kailash29792 (talk) 13:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Behavior on Commons
Jin, you've seriously got to stop uploading copyrighted images to commons. They take it much more seriously than the english Wikipedia, and that's what got you indefinitely blocked here. You've managed to get yourself in the same situation over there as well by uploading, repeatedly, copyrighted images, by lying about the source of the images and by falsely adding OTRS permission. You've even falsely claimed to represent a producer. Jin, you cannot do that here. See the commons upload log page for this account and notice that, once again, a copyrighted image has been deleted from commons because they only accept free images. Lying about the source gets the image deleted and gets you blocked even quicker. I think all of your previous socks have now been blocked. <b style="color:darkred;">Ravensfire</b> ( talk ) 14:55, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
— UY Scuti <sup style="color:green; font-family:Times;">Talk  16:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Darr Ka Blockbuster-picsay.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Darr Ka Blockbuster-picsay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Naam (upcoming film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naam (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Naam (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. D&#39;SuperHero (talk) 12:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Naamfilm.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Naamfilm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px Yellow, -4px -4px 15px Red;">SuperHero ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px Yellow, -4px -4px 15px Red;">👊 ● ★ 16:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px Yellow, -4px -4px 15px Red;">SuperHero ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px Yellow, -4px -4px 15px Red;">👊 ● ★ 20:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jinpachi TTT2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jinpachi TTT2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)