User talk:Tekubus

January 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Holocaust denial. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Holocaust denial shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Theroadislong (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Holocaust denial.  Josh3580 talk/hist 19:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

With regards to your edits to the article Holocaust denial - please absolutely don't call the Holocaust an "alleged genocide". Should you continue, you will be blocked from editing - either for trolling, or for using Wikipedia as a vehicle for your personal beliefs. (That holocaust denial and other forms of hate speech are not criminal offenses in the United States in accordance with the First Amendment is relevant information, but you should use the article talk page first to obtain consensus on how to include it in the article.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:19, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You have been warned - now I am blocking you from editing for disruption. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * See the policy of neutrality, and the related guideline on the coverage of fringe theories. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:35, 26 January 2013 (UTC)