User talk:Tekzilla

Welcome!
Hello, Tekzilla, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Valdidentro, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! clpo13(talk) 20:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Whatever dispute you have with, you'd do well not to revert his edits out of spite. clpo13(talk) 20:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

there is no dispt it is an inappropriate image--Tekzilla (talk) 20:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Please explain how this image is inappropriate for the article on Valdidentro. clpo13(talk) 20:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * you need to go to talk page if you want to change image you cant do it just like that wp is not instagram--Tekzilla (talk) 20:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 20:38, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

AIV discussion
Moved from AIV

– Reverting my previous edits, just because I reverted his edit that had a claim which didn't have any sufficient evidence. Georgij Michaliutin (talk) 20:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * there is No vandalism just because I reverted her frivolous previous edits does not mean it is vandalism there is No vandalism--Tekzilla (talk) 20:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You are reverting edits on articles you have never previously edited without giving any sort of reason. What is the reason for this or this? clpo13(talk) 20:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * inappropriate image--Tekzilla (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Tekzilla it is very pointy to revert another editor en masse because you had one disagreement. If you agree to stop doing that and go to the talk page to discuss the original disagreement then we should be good here. Prodego  talk  21:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * well Prodego  it is not the case here WP:POINT those images need aggrement first before change--Tekzilla (talk) 21:10, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

I moved the discussion here from AIV to avoid cluttering up that page. Wikipedia follows a process summarized at WP:BRD – Changes are boldly made, reverted if disagreed with, then discussed. Every change need not be discussed in advance, but disagreeing with every change a user makes is disruptive to this process. Prodego talk  21:14, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. L Faraone  21:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)