User talk:Tennisfan2000

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

POV Pushing in NJ Town
I've noted you have been selective adding sections to towns claiming they are strongly republican. You however do not do the same with towns that voted for democratic candidates. I'm not sure what your agenda is, but the lack of balance here is not good. That said, this is OK provided you don't overstate things.

So for instance, your edit here ignores the simple facts that in 2008, in Morris county, the vote was 99,085 for Christie, and 51,586 for Corzine, nearly a 2 to 1 vote for Repubicans. So Dover voted differently, but that doesn't change statement and you efforts to remove this context, when clearly the case, is suspect. I will add that by your logic, you could not claim Chester Township voted republican since that would imply that all Chester residents voted that way which is not the case.

So exactly what are you trying to show... that NJ suburbs tend to vote republican? And why are you not doing the same treatment to show that NJ Urban areas tend to vote for democratic party candidates?Mattnad (talk) 16:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The comment that any of these towns lean "very strongly" is your opinion. The source you provide is just a stat.  You're the one adding the opinion and without a reliable source that uses that descriptor, you are POV pushing.  Mattnad (talk) 05:44, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
On the basis of this edit comment, please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Thank you.Mattnad (talk) 09:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Seaside Heights politics
This edit you made to the Seaside Heights, New Jersey article restores material that had been deleted in an earlier edit. I agree that the material is useful, but what was added back in doesn't address the issue that had been raised by the editor who deleted. Can I ask you to add in the appropriate sources. If you can't, let me know on my talk page and I'll be happy to do it for you. Alansohn (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Dumont reverts
The blind reverts you have made to the article for Dumont, New Jersey remove about a dozen different sourced updates to the article and seems to add something in. Unfortunately, rather than adding in only what you want to change, you keep on undoing a tremendous numbers of clearly valid changes that have been made to the article. If you want to add or reinsert something to the article, feel free to do so, but don't blindly revert the other changes. I know that you feel strongly about something, but the nature of your revert makes it impossible to figure out what the issue is. Alansohn (talk) 04:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that the word "defeating" is correct, in the sense that you don't "win" anything by getting more votes than your opponent in one community. However, I have no issue whatsoever with the content that was added and its source, and that's what is far more important. If I had removed this in a previous edit, please understand that it was inadvertent and unintended, but the best way to put it back in is to put just that back in, rather than reverting a whole series of other changes. Alansohn (talk) 04:37, 6 October 2011 (UTC)