User talk:Tentemp

July 2022
Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Tiara Mack, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sea Cow (talk) 01:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

A lengthy welcome
Hi Tentemp. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 02:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Tentemp (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Notice
– Muboshgu (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

SK High School Edits
I noticed that you removed a large portion of the paragraphs on the South Kingstown High School article relating to the Controversy surrounding the mascot of the school and the history pertaining to it. In your edit summary, you said that the articles sourced in the section were, "Weak and very poorly sourced", but I couldn't really find any major issues with the source material. Furthermore, they support the statements made in the section pretty well. I guess I'm just looking for some extra clarification on why you thought it was necessary to edit/remove that part of the section, or maybe even if you had some more credible sources that could be cited instead? thanks. Frost.xyz (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The source is poor and don’t explicitly pin to the school. Also it’s not from the CSA. There are also many other ideas as to why it’s named the rebels. One is rebelling against the British crown the other is rebelling against king Phillip. Tentemp (talk) 10:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I still don't really understand how the article should be considered "poor". It is from a relatively reputable publisher, and although it does not directly pin it to the school or explain what the "Rebels" name is in reference to, the Johnny Reb' mascot and the confederate battle flag on the old yearbook is more than enough to infer which "Rebels" they are referring to. Furthermore, I sincerely doubt that there would be so much pushback from the public about the name if it was simply referring to the Revolutionary war, especially considering the questionable past of the school's symbolism. See: change (DOT) org/p/south-kingstown-school-commitee-changing-the-name-of-south-kingstown-highschool-rebels (Which includes an image of the yearbook back cover I mentioned earlier). Frost.xyz (talk) 15:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The reference is poor. We can’t site that kind of paper. It’s a college paper and like you said does not directly reference the school. There are multiple theories as to what the rebels means. Rebel again British crown, king Phillip, the Massachusetts bay colony, the Plymouth colony. North Kingstown is our rival, why aren’t they called the Union then? The Johny rebel mascot and CSA battle flag are not the cause of the name but rather high school kids association with the name rebel. Think dukes of hazard back when it was cool. There is no consensus as to why the name is rebel. And we can’t use a college article. I’m aware of the change from the board but it didn’t pass. Tentemp (talk) 08:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * im not sure if you meant this or not, but you said "North Kingstown is our rival", is this implying that you attend South Kingstown High School? If so, this entire situation may be a conflict of interest. Frost.xyz (talk) 15:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No situation. Unreliable source. It can’t be used. Time to move on. Have a good day Tentemp (talk) 22:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are going to continue just avoiding my question, then I will just assume you do, in fact, attend SKHS. therefore, I will be reversing the edits you have made unless you decide to actually give some sort of evidence on what makes it unreliable. Frost.xyz (talk) 16:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No consensus so you can’t reverse. I did not attend and you can’t cite a dissertation. It’s not acceptable Tentemp (talk) 22:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * See WP:RS 47.200.110.84 (talk) 22:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * That’s correct. Tentemp (talk) 22:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)