User talk:Teoth

Speedy deletion of Ashley Tisdale: The Tour
A tag has been placed on Ashley Tisdale: The Tour, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 20:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Ashley Tisdale (album)
A template has been added to the article Ashley Tisdale (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  19:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

A quick lecture on rumors
The material that you are having trouble with is all based on rumors. You did not provide any reliable sources (see WP:RS) that indicate that the things your are saying are true, and, because they are in the future, no one else is able to find them. These kind of things are called "crystal ball" violations (see WP:CRYSTAL). No hard feelings, but these things will always eventually be deleted, so you might as well not add them in the first place. If you do it a lot, hard feelings will develop, and you will be blocked from editing.Kww 21:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ashley Tisdale (album)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ashley Tisdale (album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. —C.Fred (talk) 17:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Put your crystal ball away
More work is being spent by people today to undo the things you have done. Please stop inserting articles and references to things that have not yet occurred unless you have a reliable, quotable source about it. All you are doing is creating problems for others when you do so.Kww 16:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Please, please, please put that crystal ball away
I've nominated your Tisdale's Second Studio Album article for deletion. We've already had to go through Articles for deletion/Voices (Ashley Tisdale album) and Articles for deletion/Ashley Tisdale's second studio album, and there is no reason to do it again. Remember, repeatedly recreating articles is treated as vandalism, and can get you blocked.

Vandalism
[This edit] corrupted the link to the AFD discussion, and appears to be vandalism. Do not disturb AFD notices. If you corrupt AFD notices again, you may be blocked.Kww (talk) 17:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)