User talk:Tepido

Sock edits can be reverted on sight
As a sock of Koov, I can revert anything you post, and any edit you make. The block will be coming, so I suggest you give up the game. Cheers. Doc  talk  22:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Give it up Doc9871
You still couldn't prove to me that I am the banned user Koov. So you give up your lies and leave me alone. You are the liar here. Cheers give it up Englishman. I am not the user:koov. I don't even know who that person is. User:Tepido Tepido 18:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * What new user watchlists the talkpage of the user that filed the last SPI? None. You are Koov, and the other editors will see that as easily as I did. Sad. Doc   talk  22:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

I am not the banned user:Koov Doc9871. You gave no evidence thus far. You continue to attack me because you are a very rude man. I believe that the real reason I had watchlisted the talkpage because you had no right to claim that I am Koov. You decided to attack me based on no evidence. Sad! No you are pathetic Doc9871. Just leave me alone. User:Tepido talk 18:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

I am not Koov
I am not a quack of Koov or even a sockpuppet. I tell all of the administrators that if they found out about me. They will know that I am not Koov. I don't know that person. Where is the evidence that Doc9871 has shown that I am Koov. If any administrator has any evidence talk on this user page and we can discuss it. Compare my edits with that of Koov. I only started today. I wanted to see how Wikipedia editing works out and this user compares me to a user named Koov. Just please tell me who he or she is and compare my edits. You will see I have nothing at all with koov. User:Tepido talk 18:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)