User talk:Teresleh

--jpgordon Every country has its own copyright laws, in my country I have every right to photograph anything, even goods in a store, freely post them on the Internet, even a Coca-Cola jar with a logo or a book cover. By law, you can photograph all officials. It won't be a violation. It is forbidden to post only people's faces without permission and to use photos with logos of Mercedes or Pepsi companies for commercial purposes. The more I learn about your ridiculous and absurd laws, the more I understand that there are more freedoms and human rights in my country than in your Europe and America. I am glad that Elon Musk bought Twitter for the sake of freedom of speech, at least someone in the West is fighting for justice. And then Western freedom looks more like a cheap fairy tale, but in fact in countries with less democracy there are more freedoms in some moments, we only have a problem with politics and criticism of the authorities, but otherwise it is better than in the West, you can use any pirated content and no one will judge and fine you for it, more than half of the country lives like this. Since the average consumer is not to blame for the fact that "intruders" create pirated content and product, ordinary citizens do not have time to figure out what is legal and what is not. An ordinary consumer is not to blame that he bought an underground fake vodka from an honest seller, the client does not understand the subtleties of which vodka is real and which is not. And with pirated content in the same way. It is not the consumer who violates, but the one who offers. We need to catch real criminals, not ordinary people. An ordinary person who photographed a can of cola and posted it on the Internet has no malicious or other intent, does not earn money from it, does not spoil the reputation of the company, so what is the problem? You need to clearly reconsider your Western values and absurd laws. In my country you can freely do more things than in yours, the main thing is not to poke your nose into politics, this is the only stumbling block. Speaking of Freedom, you have imposed thousands of absurd laws on yourself that bind your hands and take away your freedom. Western democracy is contradictory and looks like a global deception. Compare yourself and the people who lived in the 10th century, who had more freedom? Nature created us free and reasonable, and politicians came up with a framework that restricts freedom and also call it democracy. The Huns did not need passports and visas to ride horses to Europe, no one restricted their freedom. Europeans did not need to have passports to sail to America and stay there forever. And now some restrictions are served under the sauce of democracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.52.109.54 (talk) 18:39, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

I consider my blocking illegal, there is no reason for my blocking in the Russian wikipedia, I just added information from the public official website of the government of the Chuvash Republic, indicated all links and authorship, this is an open public Chuvash encyclopedia! I don't see any copyright infringement! Teresleh was blocked by the Q-bit array administrator at 10:58, April 23, 2022. The lock is imposed without an expiration date. Russians have never loved freedom and truth. Everyone has the right to make a mistake, especially novice users, London was not built right away either! Man did not immediately learn to fly! The lines that I added to the article about the Chuvash language are a scientifically recognized fact, and I do not know how else to write it? If I write from myself, then everyone will consider it fiction due to the lack of a primary source. If someone wrote somewhere "An apple is red and green, it grows on a tree", then does he own the copyright to this text? After all, this is not a disputed fact, not authorship. Okay, if I write on Wikipedia: humans descended from primates, will I violate Darwin's copyright? I think Wikipedia sometimes reaches the absurd. freedom of speech, democracy, all this loses its meaning. Ultimately, I did not claim and do not claim anyone's copyright. If I take a picture of the Coca Cola logo tomorrow and upload it to Wikipedia, is that also a copyright infringement? After all, I did not produce it, I did not draw the logo and the company does not belong to me. If I hurt someone's feelings, please understand and forgive, I hope elon musk buys wikipedia like twitter, and it will create normal equal conditions for everyone.