User talk:TerminalPreppie/Archive2009

Orphaned non-free media (File:Utah grizzlies ahl 200x200.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Utah grizzlies ahl 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

P. K. Subban
Hello Ccwaters. To answer your question, on the history page, the page creation diffs begin with "Created page with" in the edit summary. -- Samir 07:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Sayre Metro Area
Hi Ccwaters!

I see you put a deletion tag on the page I created Sayre Metro Area I obtained the information on the page from the following link, I would love to have the page stay on. Also just so you know the actual name of the Valley IS the Penn-York Valley, It has a 'nickname' of "The Valley".

Sayre Metro Area Info Link

Thanks --Johshandlesmand332ffs (talk) 01:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC) (Mike K)

CBJ/OTT trade draft pick
Looks like I just ass/u/med that one. I should know better. Skudrafan1 (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * TSN reported it as a 2009 pick about a minute after I removed the date from the transactions page. :) Skudrafan1 (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Pimpjuices
For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs.

Note that I am a human being, not a bot. You may contact me if you have questions. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 23:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Your recent post at Talk:University of Maine violates WP:Civility
Brevity does not make it otherwise. It has been noted for future reference. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think he was being politer than necessary. And _now_ who's making threats?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

CC, perhaps you and some colleagues could take at Mervyn Emrys' recent postings on the University of Maine talk page. I'm seriously concerned for some of my fellow Wikipedians, as this guy clearly is bring a knife to something that could easily be ajudicated fairly following Wikipedia rules. He's like trying to erase the word "flagship" from existence.--76.179.60.206 (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Not so. By all means use the "flagship" metaphor, silly as it may be, but use it correctly following WP:NPOV. Is that really so much to ask? Mervyn Emrys (talk) 21:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Faked warning templates
Actually, that one was directed at me, as far as I can tell, responding to my "politer than necessary" comment.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC):
 * Ah... ccwaters (talk) 16:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, if you are referring to the warning above this section, it refers to User:CCwaters use of WP:Lame on the University of Maine article page, which is not a Wikipedia policy as I understand it, and placing it where he/she did seemed a poor attempt at humor (that is the generous interpretation). You might also notice I have edited constructively on all the University of Maine System pages, not just the Orono page, which really was of little interest to me at the time. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, my mistake. Sorry about that; the timing of the messages confused me.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Laing
You said: "Hi. I too find the Laing situation puzzling. I actually bumped into your off-wiki inquiries about it. I think your most recent solution of taking him off the template completely is definitely not the way to go. He's on the roster in some capacity, as i don't see any transactions indicating movement (IR or reassignment) [1] [2] . I also wouldn't use the Caps site roster page as the authoritative source in the matter: I routinely update the league roster templates and the Caps is routinely lacking on updates and injuries."

Yeah, I wasn't using the roster on the Caps' site, which tends to be terrible. When I said he's not on the one given to the media I meant the one in Friday's Game Notes e-mail. That one tends to be a lot more reliable in my experience than either their site or the NHL's page. Hopefully it will clear up this week. We certainly know he's not going to be playing until next season, that's for sure. 1995hoo (talk) 23:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my userpage last week
Appreciate the attention. :-)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Toronto marlies 200x200.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Toronto marlies 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Manchester monarchs 200x200.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Manchester monarchs 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Portland pirates 200x200.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Portland pirates 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Providence bruins 200x200.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Providence bruins 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Springfield falcons 200x200.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Springfield falcons 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Worcester sharks 200x200.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Worcester sharks 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

I copy that!
Good thing you let me know that, because some others was ready to go ;) Kalel2007 (talk) 14:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wilkes-barre scranton penguins 200x200.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Wilkes-barre scranton penguins 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Syracuse crunch 200x200.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Syracuse crunch 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Peoria rivermen 200x200.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Peoria rivermen 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Craig MacTavish
My edit to Craig MacTavish's page is NOT vandalism. MacTavish pled guilty to vehicular homicide. This fact is fully documented and sourced, even on his wikipedia page. Categorizing him with Canadian murderers is accurate and not inappropriate. Wfredmason (talk) 20:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)]]

Hey
i was just wondering why you removed my edit and reported it as vandalim, this incedent actually happened i invite you to verify my story by searching it on Google™ or some other search engine that yo uprefer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oktumblechamp (talk • contribs) 18:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I guess you are referring to back in January? The burden of proof is on you and if you do find reliable sources its still not in anyway notable or encyclopedic. ccwaters (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Texas Stars
No, just a hockey fan here in Central Texas.--Txhockey (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Philadelphia phantoms 200x200.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Philadelphia phantoms 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Re.: deleted article
An article listed under the name of a regional writer ("E.J.W.") has been deleted. That's OK by me. Judging from what is left of the discussion concerning it, I take it the assumption was that it was autobiography. It was not. The author was someone I know who misguidedly thought to be paying a compliment. The person named in the title of that article happens to be a very private person these days and wholly disapproves of public exposure related to article, title, or, now, author of deleted article. (I also completely reject his editing "contributions" to the article on Rochester NY.) This is posted to you, because I tried to delete the title of that article from the tag discussion and was directed to you. I am also posting to LtPowers who made the autobiography charge explicit, and will post it to MBisanz when he returns from vacation. Thank you. Ewnnrj (talk) 02:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

ORLY?
ORLY? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.39.50 (talk) 01:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Nothing But Crosby Network??
I don't get it. Everywhere in the country that hockey is relevant they are calling NBC the "Nothing But Crosby Network" because of the constant coverage fof Crosby. Why do you have a problem with this being added to the Pittsburg Penguins page?Kenagelus (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Kenagelus 6/2/09 (1:40 PM EST)

Jeff Thom
Jeff Thom passes the WP:BIO Clause under WP:ANYBIO being recognized as part of a continual historical record. It passes. Why do you care? By the way, I dont have a WP:COI because I'm a reader of the article and was bored at work and posted it into wikipedia. Promixluvr (talk) 20:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Discussion on diacritics
You are welcome to join the discussion on diacritics here.

Cheers LarRan (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

AHL
thank you so much for fixing all the teams in the American Hockey League page. I was afraid to do it myself because i had a feeling it would get reversed by someone. Warriorshockey1 (talk) 01:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Utica devils 200x200.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Utica devils 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

National Hockey League GAR notice
National Hockey League has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Mike Rupp
This was mentioned on a local newscast (WPXI-11, an NBC affiliate out of Pittsburgh), and I feel that it was relevant to add.

I have the clip DVRed and am trying to figure out the science of moving from DVR, converting, and uploading to youtube. Bear with me and I should hopefully have it up by the end of the day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.247.148.101 (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Concert Listing
It's a concert history of the arena, part of the building's history. It helps people enjoy a walk down memory lane.```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr070363 (talk • contribs) 12:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Please discuss that here: Talk:U.S._Bank_Arena ccwaters (talk) 12:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

List of current NHL captains and alternate captains
Phew! the IP had me going there, for a bit. It's likely a honest mistake on his part, Pronger & Briere were likely wearing A's in the absence of the regulars. The exhibition season can be tricky, with veterans being healthy scratches. GoodDay (talk) 18:53, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Detroit Tigers
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 13:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Richards/Booth
I thought the same thing, but it was an AP so I figured I would have got the same exact article elsewhere. I was originally trying to word it so it was understandable (leaving the ice really doesn't give you the image of a guy lunging of the surface to hit a guy). You and I both know Richards knew what he was doing. ;)  Grsz 11  14:34, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I really don't get why he does that kind of stuff. I mean, he can actually play, as opposed to say Hartnell which makes his actions kinda understandable. ;)  Grsz 11  14:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

NHL Tiebreakers
Don't you think that if you have something called 'tiebreakers' that ties must exist? Otherwise, there is nothing to settle? :-) I put the order of the teams that are tied on points, only to indicate that they are tied on points. I only noticed today that you care enough to remove the tie rankings. In general, when discussing the current standings, people say that teams are tied if they have the same number of points. Since teams have played different numbers of games, we generally put the team that has played less games higher up in the order, although they could go out and lose the games in hand. To me, they are tied on points until the end of the season, when the tiebreaking procedures are then used, when teams have played equal numbers of games. It's all a bit informal until the finish. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this... Alaney2k (talk) 21:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

United States Geographical MOS
A while back ago, you were involved in a discussion about how to refer to the United States Geographical locations on wikipedia. A similar discussion is taking place here. Any comments on this topic would be helpful.--Jojhutton (talk) 00:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)