User talk:Terminator15

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User talk:Xeno has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  02:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Xeno. Continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Thank you. Tb hotch Talk and C.  02:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Niko Bellic, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Niko Bellic was changed by Terminator15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913923 on 2011-01-18T11:56:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:56, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Niko Bellic, you may be blocked from editing. If you disagree with other editors please discuss the issues on the article's talk page: do not disrupt Wikipedia to try to insist on your view. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, despite warnings. An article is not the place to express your disagreements with other editors: when your block has expired please use the article's talk page for discussion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Nikola Tesla. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  09:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

March 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to disrupt Wikipedia by adding original research and Serbian nationalism to articles and insulting editors and disrupting their talk pages, despite having been previously blocked for the same. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   13:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)