User talk:Ternohovha

July 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to P. G. Wodehouse has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: P. G. Wodehouse was changed by Ternohovha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942959 on 2015-07-13T14:31:32+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aleksei Sergeyevich Sergeyev. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast 14:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Catholic Church, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Catholic Church was changed by Ternohovha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970596 on 2015-07-13T14:42:22+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brockhaus Enzyklopädie. lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast 14:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

I'm just letting you know that I've reverted several of your edits as they did not seem constructive. Please refrain from randomly posting what appears to be talk page content on random articles.

Thank you,

Bad Weather 2014 My work • What's wrong? 14:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)


 * And I have reverted the rest. That was fun and completely pointless. -- ‖ Ebyabe  talk -   Inspector General   ‖ 14:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaan Laas


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jaan Laas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Jaan Laas. 331dot (talk) 14:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 15:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)