User talk:Terraflorin/Archive 1

{| style="text-align:left; border:2px solid #6D071A; background-color:#F4FEFE; width: 200px;font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;" ..........................................................................................................................................

(talk) 11:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Vodafone
I noticed your comment at Talk:Vodafone which compared Vodafone's logo with part of the logo for the KKK. I hope you don't mind, but I have removed the comment because talk pages should only be used to discuss the improvement of the article. It is not appropriate to introduce speculation about coincidences of appearance between parts of different images. Johnuniq (talk) 22:02, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of 2011 in science for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article 2011 in science, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2011 in science until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Winner 42 Talk to me!  02:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2011 in science


A tag has been placed on 2011 in science requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ray Talk 03:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Retro Hugos
Hi, I've been working on the Hugo Award articles for the last 9 months, getting 9 of them to be Featured Lists. I noticed that you created Retro Hugos- I left a comment on the talk page, but I figured that I'd talk here too. I really fail to see the point of this page- it's just a duplicate of information presented elsewhere. Each award page (novels, novellas, etc.) has it's own retro hugos listed. We don't combine the regular awards by year; why would we combine the retro hugos by year? In fact, all you've done is copy the tables out of those articles and pasted them here- where's the added value of this page? -- Pres N  07:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Dacia
Bună! I've been working to set up the WikiProject Dacia to organize better the articles about Dacia and improve their quality. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Maybe you find it interesting and wish to join. Thanks and best regards! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Linking to ro: inside doc page please
Hey, I noticed you added links to Romanian language versions of various templates. Please put those in the documentation of the template instead of in the template itself. I've already done this for InternalLink -> InternalLink/doc to show what I mean. I would appreciate it if you could fix the other changes you made. Thanks! — SkyLined (talk) 19:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Păcală


A tag has been placed on Păcală requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. → Σ  τ  c. 05:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Păcală
- SDPatrolBot (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Tintin and Snowy picture
Do you know anything more about that Tintin and Snow picture you just added to the Adventures of Tintin article? It looks like it's a picture of (life-sized?) statues - it would be useful to know where/when/why they exist, otherwise the pic raises more questions than it answers. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 14:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Alexander John Cuza vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza
Please can you say your option about Alexander John Cuza vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza at Talk:Alexander_John_Cuza. -- Thanks, Saturnian (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Discussion you should be aware of
See WP:FTN. Dougweller (talk) 14:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Translation request of Battle of Canton (Romanian)

 * Hey, I don't speak Romanian. But I saw you created the Second Opium War. Maybe you would like to translate the Battle of Canton into Romanian. The battle is also a part of the opium war, which was the beginning of the Anglo-French conflict. Thank you.--俠刀行 (talk) 12:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * not me, talk with Andrei Stroe -- Terraflorin (talk) 14:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh, the article will be also Translation of the week. Forgot to tell that.--俠刀行 (talk) 15:54, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It needs an expert. But thanks for all.--俠刀行 (talk) 16:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You way want to post that request also to WP:ROMANIA/WT:ROMANIA. Regards.--Codrin.B (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Romanian cultures
Hey, I have some questions of Romanian cultures. I need a simple way to contact outside the wikipedia.--俠刀行 (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited The Abbey (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of scientists who believed in Biblical Creation


The article List of scientists who believed in Biblical Creation has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced list, no way to test credibility of claim

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Careful with your language, please
My edit was not vandalism: it was removal of a highly dubious source. Nne of the sources in the article in question have any pretence to a NPOV.TheLongTone (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming
Worst article on Wikipedia. But it's probably too soon for another AfD; there's enough people determined to have it still exist that will descend and spam the AfD that neutral editors will never be heard, and they'll all cry "Speedy Keep! It's notable! Too soon! We don't care about all the policies it violates! We make up our own bullshit interpretations of policy!" 86.** IP (talk) 20:16, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Plants Collaboration of the month
I'm attempting to revive the Plant article COTM, and since you're a member of WikiProject Plants, you're being notified about this hopeful revival. Please feel free to propose articles for collaboration, and thanks for your consideration! Northamerica1000(talk) 12:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

SIA project!
Hey Terraflorin! So happy that you came by the Smithsonian Institution Archives project and signed up to participate! We've got a great list of subjects that need to be improved upon or written about. I do hope you'll visit the to-do list and dive in - do let me know if you need anything. And of course, your contributions can earn you the official oh so fancy SIA barnstar :) Thanks again! So happy to have you on board! SarahStierch (talk) 23:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Editura Ion Creanga
Buna, si te rog sa-mi ierti intarzierea (nu din aroganta am raspuns tarziu, ci pentru ca sunt f. multe lucruri de facut pe wikipedia si in viata cotidiana).

De fapt, e destul de plictisitor sa scrii un articole cap-coada a doua oara, mai ales ca eu ar trebui sa pun diacriticele manual (nu le am instalate, caci cele "noi" nu mi-ar trebui pt altceva decat wikipedia). Daca iti suna bine, as putea face cam ce am facut pt articolul despre Creanga sau alte cateva: sa ajut la redactarea in comun a textului - furnizand citatele in original pentru sursele care nu-s online, sau verificand traducerile din engleza in original. Ai putea sa-l intrebi pe Andrei Stroe daca e interesat sa ne/va ajute cu asta. Dahn (talk) 08:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Bine atunci, voi incerca sa-l scriu in format fara diacritice aici, intr-o cutie cu nisip, si te las sa-l modifici cum crezi necesar. Dar s-ar putea sa dureze ceva timp pana ajung s-o fac.
 * Imi cer scuze daca te-am suparat, nu a fost intentia mea sa par artagos, sau sa presupun ca tu n-ai lucruri mai bune de facut. Exprimam doar faptul ca, daca ma lasi doar pe mine sa-l scriu, si "mai repede" (din asta am presupus o nota de urgenta), s-ar putea sa dureze oricum mai mult decat daca am face cumva altfel, si rezultatul n-ar fi garantat. Nu am vrut sa para un "ce-ar fi sa-l faceti voi, hm?", cum se pare ca l-ai citit. Nu am nimic impotriva sa fac tot ce-mi propui, doar ca, asa cum o stiu toti cei care-mi cer lucruri similare (chiar si pe enwiki), nu sunt cel mai rapid om din lume, mai ales cand vine vorba de a face de doua ori acelasi lucru.
 * Si adaug ca respect si apreciez tot ce faci deja pentru rowiki. Dahn (talk) 10:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Neeson and Islam
Regarding this edit, I just want to clarify that there is no direct quote in the article for the claim made. What we have is a headline that interprets (incorrectly in my view) a number of reported statements, none of which explicitly state that Neeson has considered renouncing his faith for another. He has reportedly expressed an interest in, and respect for, Islam. Nothing more. We need to be careful when using The Sun as a source. It has been discussed before in that context. Best. RashersTierney

Nomination of Jerusalem Dome of the Rock UFO incident for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerusalem Dome of the Rock UFO incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jerusalem Dome of the Rock UFO incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BenTels (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited The Crawling Hand, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tristram Coffin and Stan Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nemexia Evolution


A tag has been placed on Nemexia Evolution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wyatt Riot (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mihail, câine de circ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Codrin.B (talk) 11:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dionysius Exiguus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)