User talk:Terrariola/Archive/2018/August

Welcome!
Hello, Terrariola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy declined
I've declined your speedy deletion request on Marijan Šuto. The article makes a credible assertion of notability: Šuto plays for a fully professional association football team in his country's top professional league. Take this to WP:AFD if you still feel it merits deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy declined
I've declined your speedy deletion request on Natakhtari Airfield because your rationale, "non-notable airfield", does not fit any of the criteria for speedy deletion. Speedy deletion is a very narrowly defined process, and articles that don't meet any of the existing criteria should not be nominated for speedy deletion. If you feel this airfield does not meet the criteria for inclusion, I suggest you pursue one of the other avenues of deletion, but please remember to exercise due diligence and make sure you check for sources BEFORE you nominate for deletion.

Also, I note that your second edit (under this registered name, at least) was to Don't demolish the house while it's still being built. You don't appear to have taken the meaning of that essay after having edited it. Please be somewhat discriminate in your speedy deletion tagging. In general, you should give a new article at least a few minutes to be fleshed out before tagging, and then only tag if it it's clear that the new article's topic won't possibly meet criteria. New editors often drop a single sentence or two on a page simply to "reserve the name". (Completely unnecessary, of course, but a common newbie mistake.) By tagging such articles too quickly, you may discourage the new editor from ever completing it.
 * This tag was applied too soon.
 * This tag was applied too soon.
 * This tag was applied too soon.

Finally, I note that, although you registered this account over six months ago, you've made less than 50 edits. WP:NPP recommends that users have at least 200 mainspace maintenance edits prior to even embarking on the Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy training. (See Stop NPP.) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

A quick note
Please do not initiate Articles for Deletion discussions only 4 minutes after an article has been created. Did you consider options such as Redirecting or Merging? Articles for Deletion discussions are generally used as a last resort, not a knee-jerk reaction. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 11:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

OK thank you. Terrariola (talk) 11:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Mail
Can you tell me your email? --Nihat Hasanli (talk) 09:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Why? Terrariola (talk) 10:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

You have deleted article, i couldn't understand reason. Please explain here or mail me, if possible. --Nihat Hasanli (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Please read wikipedia policy. There weren't any sources and, if there were sources out there, do not put your article in the namespace. For example, your article named "Azer-turk bank" should be named "Draft:Azer-turk bank" so regular users reading wikipedia for information won't come across an unsourced article. Unsourced articles are breeding grounds for vandalism. Terrariola (talk) 07:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for information. I didnt finished article and would put references. --Nihat Hasanli (talk) 09:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Warning levels
When warning editors, please increment the level by one if there is already a warning. On Cluebot had left a warning just previously. It would have been best to add GOOD Music See Template messages/User talk namespace for a list of warning messages. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, i didn't know if i should increment the level by one or to do something else.Terrariola (talk) 10:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello Terrariola. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Ankesh kumar maurya. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. (I know that this warning is a little bit late but still) Lil Johnny (talk) 11:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

not constructive?
hello,

i'm not sure why you deemed my content not constructive. it is a fact, & whether that puts the subject in a glowing light or not is not my concern. i have a right to add to the "open door policy" that its not really open door. people would want to know that & to say otherwise is false.

d Dblondie (talk) 07:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

sandbox
I checked Sandbox and rechecked the posting rules & don't see anything I want to change about my edit. Its not libelous or attacking in any way. I dont need to use Sandbox. Your deletion of my edit came instantly after I posted it. If it was in the wrong place or needed its own heading under Criticism I would appreciate those kinds of tips. Why am I being treated like my writing is worthy of being deleted and censored? Dblondie (talk) 07:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

It was an unsourced claim. Terrariola (talk) 09:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Found your question
I found your question on the cluebot page and I'm here to anwser it. I made an edit to a page and cluebot deleted something on the page that I didn't even do but said it was vandalism even though I didn't type it so yes possibly it should. Dinah Kirkland (talk) 17:27, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Im talking about Cluebot III (The archiving bot) not Cluebot NG (The anti-vandal bot) Terrariola 18:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Si I know. Dinah Kirkland (talk) 18:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Which is quite strange. I have no clue why it did it but I understand which bot your talking about. Dinah Kirkland (talk) 23:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Uncostructive?
What exactly is unconstructive and how do you prove your statement?--Taribuk (talk) 08:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

It looked like vandalism to me, if you could explain why it wasn't, I would appreciate it. Terrariola 08:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Nothing was ever vandalised there. All my edits were supported by references.--Taribuk (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you want, you can re-add the changes, it still looked like vandalism to me though.
 * I know this is an old discussion but i would just like to point out that Taribuk may be knowingly vandalising pages and removing warnings from his talk page (he has removed several warnings claiming they were personal attacks). Lavalizard101 (talk) 14:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Deleted my additions
You really just deleted a lot of my additions with no reason given other than "don't do that". What did I do wrong exactly? DiePanzerJager (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Oops, I didn't review the other 3, sorry about that, however, for the first one (Which I reviewed) it wasn't really necessary. Good faith revert.

Ok. Why do you think it wasn't neccersary (I'm not trying to argue, but I joined the site yesterday and I want to know for future reference) DiePanzerJager (talk) 09:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

You don't need to point people in the direction of a source, they can click it whenever they feel like it.

How do you mean? DiePanzerJager (talk) 09:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Just leave the source there and let people click it, don't say "Source for this part of the article is here:" Terrariola 09:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Economy of the Holy Roman Empire


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Economy of the Holy Roman Empire, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 23:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Terrariola. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ATerrariola enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  Malinaccier ( talk ) 13:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Welcome to WP:STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Editing User talk:Yobot
On the page User talk:Yobot there is a box with the message "Please edit this page only if you want to stop Yobot." When you made this edit you stopped the bot. Also, there is rarely much point in posting a message on a talk page to someone who edited there once three months ago and never again, especially if you don't ping them, as they will probably never see your message. On this occasion it is even less likely than usual that the editor will see your message, as a quick look at his contributions history shows that he hasn't edited since July. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)\
 * Oh, sorry about that. Won't make that mistake again. Terrariola 07:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

My changes to the quad cities river bandits
Please, do explain. I'm exercising a constitutional as well as cyber right of mine. There is no law or cyber law stating that by changing the information in said articles too the truth, as harsh as it may be, is wrong. Now - Why leave the option open too edit on such an article if another user, and or guest, can't change the article too something people are more familiar with? Please, let me know where I was wrong - I'll wait. Dtdpronoun (talk) 13:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)


 * You blanked the page and replaced it with "Their name gives the town a bad look as well as the logo."
 * That isn't truth, that's blatant vandalism. Also, truth doesn't matter on Wikipedia, only verifiability.
 * Finally, it's not a right to vandalise Wikipedia, just as it isn't your right to spray paint "This store sucks!" on the door of your local grocery store. Terrariola 13:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
for making the most hilarious user page ever lol

Da_dilo_dude (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC) 

I added a simple definition of what Chipko Andolan stands for and you removed it without even providing any comments!


 * Please give a reliable source for your "Simple definition"
 * Also, No personal attacks Terrariola 13:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)