User talk:Terrillfrantz

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Merger integration
The article is about some business practice, but many of the references are a website with the exact same name. Do you work for them? Also, I'm seeing copy paste from that website. Please explain. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

I stuck that question about you working for them. I see that you don't, and didn't add the references to www.mergerintegration.com which is just a business, and really isn't a very good source. Do you think those references could be replaced with something from, say, google scholar? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:39, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Okay, so I struck the copy paste thing too. :) Please forgive me. I'm dead tired. I see that in this edit, some IP added a huge block of copyvio content from http://www.mergerintegration.com/pdfs/post-merger-integration-management.pdf. Consider reverting my restoration of that "see also" link too. I'm not in my right mind today. :)

That said, Merger integration has a problem. If you want (I can't because I don't know the subject), please remove the offending copyvio content, and the commercial links used as references (http://www.mergerintegration.com).

Finally, welcome again. Sorry for the hastiness. I think I actually topped the hastiness of that character in the Pickwick Papers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Message
13:42, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The H.An Winston & Co. couple logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The H.An Winston & Co. couple logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)