User talk:Terristevens

Welcome!
Hello, Terristevens, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Belouis Group, Australia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Belouis Group, Australia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Belouis Group, Australia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest and paid editing in Wikipedia
Hello Terristevens. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Terristevens. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Jytdog (talk) 02:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message. I am receiving no payment and have no interest in...I'm assuming Rhys Knight. I do however consider him to be an important figure in relation to mental health and related authorship in Australia and, despite never meeting him, wish to make sure that non-medical mental health advocates are given proper recognition. I did create his page, and put a link to Amazon which was foolish as it appeared promotional and I will delete it. Importantly, he is a public figure of some repute and certainly worhty of inclusion Terristevens (talk) 02:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying! You also created an article about an Australian investment company. New authors, companies... this is the typical stuff of freelancers or people who work for digital PR agencies.  Your response is not really credible, given what you have done so far. Just in case you are not aware of it, there is a place for such editors here, but there is pretty narrow path to follow, and disclosure is the obligatory first step... Jytdog (talk) 03:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I understand how it looks and I shouldn't have published the company article, it was supposed to be associated with the Church of the Scientology, something that has been covered in the news. Regardless, I understand how it looks and am happy to sit back for a period of time if that helps my credibility. I get it, but I'm just trying to contribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User: (talk • contribs) 03:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying.  Quick note on the logistics of discussing things on Talk pages, which are essential for everything that happens here. In Talk page discussions, we "thread" comments by indenting (see WP:THREAD) - when you reply to someone, you put a colon in front of your comment, which the Wikipedia software will render into an indent when you save your edit; if the other person has indented once, then you indent twice by putting two colons in front of your comment, which the WP software converts into two indents, and when that gets ridiculous you reset back to the margin (or "outdent") by putting this  in front of your comment. This also allows you to make it clear if you are also responding to something that someone else responded to if there are more than two people in the discussion; in that case you would indent the same amount as the person just above you in the thread.  I hope that all makes sense. And at the end of the comment, please "sign" by typing exactly four (not 3 or 5) tildas "~" which the WP software converts into a date stamp and links to your talk and user pages when you save your edit.  That is how we know who said what to whom and when.


 * Please be aware that threading and signing are fundamental etiquette here, as basic as "please" and "thank you", and continually failing to thread and sign communicates rudeness, and eventually people may start to ignore you (see here).


 * I know this is insanely archaic and unwieldy, but this is the software environment we have to work on. Sorry about that. Will reply on the substance in a second... Jytdog (talk) 03:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I hear you. btw, there are many, MANY articles that need maintenance and improvement. Creating new pages is not the only way to contribute. :) Jytdog (talk) 03:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much, you've no idea how much this helps. Not archaic at all, just good to know the etiquette. I have been making edits also, and hopefully adding some value. Australian authors and political figures are my expertise, so that's where I'm focusing. I also noted that I didn't state clearly that I am not receiving any compensation, directly or indirectly, from any party. Thanks again for your help (and please pull me up on any clumsy mistakes... (old dog, new tricks etc) Terristevens (talk) 03:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like an all-in-one-place orientation to Wikipedia, you can have a look at User:Jytdog/How if you like. It is not so much about concrete things like indenting and signing, but more a) foundational and b) big picture. Orientation. If you like! 04:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This is right up my alley, I shall read it this evening. Thank you again for your help and patience. Terristevens (talk) 04:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Rhys Knight, Author of Little White Helpers.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rhys Knight, Author of Little White Helpers.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 09:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)