User talk:Terry Benedict

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vladimir Titar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Vladimir Titar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladimir Titar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vladimir Titar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Benboy00 (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oleg Kokhan


The article Oleg Kokhan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Benboy00 (talk) 16:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Bleen POV, Hoax
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Seems like all your edits are to drum up credibility for this Bleen Indigogo scam. There is even an article that mentions this account by name, I have an actual reference to it. Please refrain from using wikipedia to further your Indigogo scam.

http://betabeat.com/2014/11/could-this-holograph-projector-be-the-next-great-indiegogo-scam/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.46.146.109 (talk) 06:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia Team, Bleen Inc. is a company registered in the State of Wyoming in 02/12/14, the company ID: 658866, Employee Identification Number: 37-1749866. Bleen Inc. possesses all papers that can reassure that it is a real company. Moreover all members of Bleen Inc. are real personalities. The actions taken look like indulging someone's desires to drag Bleen's name through the mud. We think that Wikipedia is an independent resource, and anyone can make a contribution to this knowledge treasury. However, your action leaves little room for that statement. Can you please provide the actual reason for deletion of profiles and opening this talk with such offending title as "Hoax". The information in the article you've mentioned is full of vapor, no facts - just ideas and shot in the dark. Please think again about Wikipedia's reputation, because actions based on uncertain facts will only lead to nowhere.

Looking at the talk history the username on this account used to be called BleenInc. It was changed after the Kokhan article was deleted for the first time.

It does not seem the pages for Kokhan and Vladimir were made so BleenInc could share information about these individuals. They were made as promotional pages for supposed employees of the company to give crediablity to their product and claims.

Kokhan and Vladimir did not have proper sources. The claims in the articles could not be verified.

I am not sure how these articles can be NPOV when BleenInc is creating pages about their own supposed employees.

Seems like the proper actions were taken by deleting both of these articles. Again please refrain from publishing your self promotional articles on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.46.146.109 (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Please discuss further on admins board.

50.46.146.109 (talk) 05:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to use the word hoax, I think a more accurate description is fraudulent company. That is just my opinion though, if the articles were valid they could have stayed but they are not.

As for the link, the article pointed out a very important thing. The articles on the supposed Bleen personal were all created by this account, user:Terry Benedict formally known as user:BleenInc. This fact can be easily verified using wikipedia delete logs, history, etc.

I don't think anyone wants to take Bleen through the mud. Like you mentioned wikipedia reputation is important and allowing for articles like Titar and Kokhan hurt that. Both read as self promotion for Bleen and are filled with unverifiable claims. As was stated to you several times there are rules on content that is submitted. These articles violate the very core of wikipedias content policies WP:CCPOL. Not neutral (read like self promotion), not verifiable (claims on awards, books, Bleen, etc), and no original research (announcements about Titar and Kokhans work on Bleen, etc). The articles are not knowledge being contributed but self promotion. Also my opinion Bleen is a fraudulent company using wikipedia to commit fraud and scam people out of money.

Oleg Kokhan might be a real person but it is questionable if he works for is affiliated with Bleen. Regardless though the article on Kokhan read like self promotion for Bleen. The two sentances below are good example of this, also it talks about things he is going to do in the future for Bleen.

"Due to Oleg's well-known reputation as a true professional and his numerous contacts in the USA, Europe, Asia he is going to be Bleen's image around the world. Taking into account his business communication experience, ability to promote the idea and get out the message makes him a driving force and a crucial element in Bleen machine"

In the article you stated he works at the San Francisco office but it doesnt appear there is a real San Francisco office. The company was registered through a website called mynewcompany.com. The company address on the filing and on the website (website doesnt specify floor or suite) is to a virtual office company called regus. It appears Bleen pays at least $199 dollars a month for mail and phone service.

https://wyobiz.wy.gov/business/FilingDetails.aspx?eFNum=245096157208164108061004068082171047028180131076

http://www.mynewcompany.com/

http://www.regus.com/locations/office-space/california-san-francisco-315-montgomery

Also just my opionion but it doesnt appear that Oleg in the videos and pictures of Oleg the producer are the same person. Possibly Oleg in the video is a double for the scam? I feel bad for the real Oleg Kokhan if this is the case.

Again please discuss further on admins board.

50.46.146.109 (talk) 05:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted for the same reason it was the first time. It was deleted under WP:BLPPROD as an unsourced BLP. You recreated it but it was still unsourced. -Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 07:54, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Oleg Kokhan
When you created this article it lacked sources. Read wp:V and wp:BLP.