User talk:Terryandbarb5

July 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Parm Gill. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please do not remove content that has been properly cited from credible sources. Thank you. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by XYZtSpace (talk • contribs)


 * If you object to the content about controversies, you may post to Talk:Parm Gill to discuss the reasons why you feel they were "inaccurately reported" and should be removed from the article. However, the content is reliably sourced, so you are not at liberty to simply deem yourself eligible to remove it from the article entirely. Again, you may post to the article's talk page to explain the reasons why you feel it should be removed — but if you simply remove it yourself one more time without discussion to establish a consensus that the content should be removed, I'm going to lock the page so that you can't edit it at all. We're not unreasonable here, and we are willing to discuss matters like this — but we're not a place where every individual editor gets to simply make up their own rules about what an article should or should not include, we're a place where disagreements about what to include get discussed. Bearcat (talk) 18:57, 4 July 2018 (UTC)