User talk:TerrydatRealterryo

Speedy deletion nomination of St Jude's Church, Swansea


A tag has been placed on St Jude's Church, Swansea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://parish.churchinwales.org.uk/s464/about/history/information-on-the-old-st-judes-church/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Saqib (talk) 06:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve St Jude's Church, Swansea
Hi, I'm Caorongjin. TerrydatRealterryo, thanks for creating St Jude's Church, Swansea!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be useful to add different references and to omit or rewrite (e.g., write in prose the landmarks) much of the latter text.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Caorongjin (talk) 21:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Austenasia
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Katechon08 (talk) 21:24, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Repeat copyright violations
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

so you Refencance you own Webpage to your Page and you still get Blocked even Thought you Own the Copy Right again how is this RIGHT?
 * If, after the expiration of this block, you add copyrighted content again, you will be blocked indefinitely. If you're not willing or able to read and comprehend our WP:COPYRIGHT policy, you probably shouldn't be editing Wikipedia in the first place. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

so the Copy right you Talking about we had a Church Own its from our Own Webpage on our Own Wiki Page yet we upload our own WIki page and Ref it from our Own Church Webpage and you keep removing it. Again how if we Own the Copy Right are We breaching Copy Right Rules?

So we Give permission to upload our Wiki Page as you know we own the Copy Right to we Give permission to upload that so how am I braking the your WP:COPYRIGHT policy if AGAIN we Give permission to upload our Wiki Page as you know we own the Copy Right to we Give permission to upload.

Talk 00:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC) Do you not Understand that if someone owns the Copytright and there the ones uploading the Content then they obviously Giver Persimmon for it to be used or did this fly past you.

331dot May be do some checking yourself about the First Admin also as someone who deals with Copy right in Courts daily I believe you are wrong this has been past on to your Arbitration Committee |Arbitration committee}}the Thetas are enough for a Systematic  Bullying charge and I have also Emailed your Legal Team as your braking GDPR by holding a person IP Address

July 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 14:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * just a note that this user has contacted ArbCom, and speaking entirely for myself I view their comments above as "I contacted your legal team about this", not necessarily "I'm going to take legal action". I will, however, leave it up to you whether to keep their talk page access revoked and require them to appeal through UTRS. Primefac (talk) 18:18, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The user referred to a "Systematic Bullying charge" and "your braking GDPR by holding a person IP Address" which sounds like some sort of law. 331dot (talk) 18:22, 25 July 2021 (UTC)