User talk:TeslaWannaBe/sandbox

Peer Review (by Daniel Cummins): For your piece on indigenous archeology, it seems like you are taking a stance by saying things like, "These viewpoints interpreted indigenous artifacts and practices under political and racial agendas." You may want to use more objective language, such as saying that some people have criticized the field for those reasons. The first part of your article also does not include any sources, so I would definitely be sure to provide where you got this information.

The second part of your article, on modern archeology, seems fairly biased as well, as your language criticizes the field without providing significant citation. I would try to write more dispassionately, and present arguments as being held by particular people or institutions. I would once again add more sources to this section as well, as you currently only have two sources.

This could be a very impactful article and interesting topic, I would just make sure you focus on cited information and presently it without personal arguments. Spelling, sentence structure, and grammar look great.

--Daniel