User talk:Tessaracter/Archive 1/Archives/ 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smita Prakash (February 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Smita Prakash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Smita Prakash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Smita_Prakash Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Smita_Prakash reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Removal of sourced content
Please do not remove reliably-sourced content, as you did here. If any other reliable source contradicts this content, feel free to cite it in the article. utcursch &#124; talk 20:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Dheerajmpai23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Battle of Koregaon did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm Gazoth. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User:Shreyas112358 that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 20:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you - Dheeraj

Your recent editing history at 2019 Indian general election shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  D Big X ray ᗙ  16:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Rdr78 (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC) I will try to get a few more people to start fixing this. It is definitely being hijacked for propaganda. You must try to ask your friend's to make these edits too. Individual members definitely don't have the resources to counter them.

Thank you for your support Rdr78 It is unfortunate that the Election page is hijacked. It is similar to the way the anti-democratic people hijack the media and educational institutions. I am trying my best. I will make a list od news articles that counter the false propagande and post it in the Talk page(And also on this page).

Dheerajmpai23 (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Dheerajmpai23 (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC) Also note that if you revert the edits you might be blocked from editing. So do not revert the edits. Instead we can make changes later when we have consolidated the information.

Speedy deletion nomination of Lakshmi Bai Kelkar


A tag has been placed on Lakshmi Bai Kelkar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hinduscriptures.com/hindu-lifestyle/lakshmibai-kelkar-mausiji/27107/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan discretionary sanctions
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright infringement, last warning
Hi! I've just deleted Draft:Lakshmi Bai Kelkar. You had re-posted the same content that had already been deleted as a copyright violation here, with the same copying from an external non-free source (clearly marked "Copyright © 2018 Shrivedant Foundation"). Perhaps you did not read the notice "Speedy deletion nomination of Lakshmi Bai Kelkar" higher up this page? Anyway, please read this: if you again copy non-free material from external sources into Wikipedia, you can expect to lose your editing privileges without any further warning. So ... please don't! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Twinkle
Hi, I see that you have taken to warning users on Wikipedia against vandalism. I would like to suggest that you use the Twinkle tool. it makes the process a lot easier. Jeb3 Talk at me here  15:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your warning
Hi Dheerajmpai23!

I noticed that you left Allkir669 a final warning for using racist language on Clarkson University. However, it doesn't appear that they have edited that page, or used racist language anywhere, clicking at random through their contributions. So, I'm somewhat puzzled as to what you thought merited a final warning. I'm just asking because I think it would be rather discouraging for a new user to have that left on their talk page undeservedly. aboideautalk 15:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I ended up citing wrong page. I am sorry. I have corrected it now.

2019 Indian general election in Tamil Nadu
Hi in tamilnadu  DMK lead alliance name as called  SPA ( Secular progressive alliance ) they are not in UPA also UPA didn't formed yet officially. refer : 1, https://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/lok-sabha-elections-2019-dmk-alliance-announces-constituencies-calls-it-secular-progressive-alliance-2008378

2,https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/dmk-led-front-in-tn-christened-secular-progressive-alliance-119031500955_1.html 3,https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/lok-sabha-elections-2019-dmk-chief-mk-stalin-launches-secular-progressive-alliance/articleshow/68435447.cms 4, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manikbasha2019 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your warning on my talk page
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:HonestManBad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

You reverted my edit on PewDiePie vs T-Series, and left a vandalism warning on my talk page. This appears to be in bad faith, or due to a lack of understanding. I have reverted your edits and given the reasons in the edit summary. Regardless of who's right on the PewDiePie vs T-Series issue, my edit was in good faith. The particular warning template you used requires not only bad faith on my part, but repeated vandalism. You must understand what a warning template means before issuing it. HonestManBad (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Warning
Don't write anything on My User page! You can leave Message for any Topic only on My talk page! Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuxr (talk • contribs) 23:24, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Then why have you written on my page. First you stop writing on my page. I can see you have got so many warnings from many users and charges of vandalism are raised. I am slowly getting able to know who you are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 06jay007 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Smita Prakash moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Smita Prakash, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. While you've provided several sources, most of them do not appear to be reliable. #1 is from Opindia, a publication that has been regarded as unreliable at WP:RSN, #2 is the subject's personal site (not independent), #3 is reliable provides almost no actual information about Prakash (and does not support the claim that she anchored the longest running show in South Africa), #4 and #5 don't appear to have been discussed on Wikipedia but similarly do not look reliable, and #6 is a primary source. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title), where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed,Rosguill talk 18:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Unexplained deletions and improper tagging
Dheeraj, can you explain why you: Abecedare (talk) 07:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * deleted sourced and relevant content from the Abha Mahato article and then tagged it for deletion?
 * deleted similar sourced and relevant content from the Shailendra Mahato?
 * tagged the Rakesh Sachan as an unsourced BLP even though it did contain sources?
 * , I will also note the blatant faking of references, over here. &#x222F; WBG converse 14:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * He also deleted a warning for disruptive editing by Bbb23 here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dheerajmpai23&diff=889783469&oldid=889782850
 * Not sure if he was justified to delete it, but he sure does get into a lot of conflicts, so I thought it should be noted. HonestManBad (talk) 21:14, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Abecedare, based on the pages that I watch, I observe that he also has a peculiar habit of turning up at new articles, e.g. Khalistan movement to edit war and get into disputes in support of a group of editors.-- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Did you notice that he undid your edit war warning? HonestManBad (talk) 18:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rahul Gandhi, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

DS Notice
-- D Big X ray ᗙ  16:04, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Aatish Taseer. ''Care to explain why you reverted my addition here? I am not a "Biased Vandal".'' theinstantmatrix (talk) 17:22, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vivekananda Kendra, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yuva Brigade


Hello, Tessaracter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuva Brigade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:History of Indian Constitution


Hello, Tessaracter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of Indian Constitution".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 14:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC)