User talk:Test 2

September 2016
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jörg Colberg— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  08:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jörg Colberg. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jörg Colberg was changed by Test 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917711 on 2016-09-13T08:28:01+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jörg Colberg, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  08:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

why did you delete what i said caus i think he's cool

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiPancake was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Test 2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Test_2/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiPancake&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Test_2/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Wiki Pancake  ✉ 📖 13:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jörg Colberg. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 21:07, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Penrith Anglican College has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Penrith Anglican College was changed by Test 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853808 on 2016-10-17T23:27:07+00:00.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)