User talk:Testing times

Destruction of the Country House exhibition
If I knew how to nominate a page for "Do You know" I would nominate Destruction of the Country House exhibition. However, I don't, so you will probbly have to suffice with a well done from me. Giacomo Returned 21:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945


The article List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * An unlikely intersection of barely notable categories - non-league clubs in the FA Cup, okay, but non-league clubs into the fifth round? and then, since 1945? There appears to be no evidence that this variety of intersections is notable in any way.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:48, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Golden raspberry
To be fair, I was waiting for it. Thanks for popping out of hibernation to deliver it. No hard feelings, I hope, I'm like Dweller, happy to re-evaluate. I'll read your lengthy argument in a moment, but as a rule of thumb, if I see an article that's called "X who did Y for Z before A" I immediately feel like it's contrived. In any case, will head back there now. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)