User talk:Tet/Archive 1

Microsoft Security Essentials
Hello

I have reviewed your contribution to Microsoft Security Essentials and found the following problems with it:
 * 1) You had changed the style of an access date from DMY to ISO-YMD. This is a violation of WP:DATESRET.
 * 2) You had changed "Windows 8 and later" into "Windows 8 and Windows 10", which is wrong. Did you forget about Windows 8.1?
 * 3) You had added "However, Windows Defender is the default antivirus software for Windows 10." This statement is:
 * 4) Out of context
 * 5) Novel, and has no appeared in the body (violation WP:LEAD
 * 6) Irrelevant to the subject of the article (it is about Windows 10 and Defender)
 * 7) Grammatically and semantically wrong. "Software" is an uncountable noun which means "collection of apps taken together". Windows Defender is not a collection of apps. It is one app.

Perhaps it is best that you familiarize yourself with best practices of editing Wikipedia before moving on to editing Featured Articles.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice and sorry for the wrong edits. I'll take all the information you gave me here to become a better editor in the future. Thanks! Tetizeraz (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Tetizeraz! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 13:30, Saturday, July 15, 2017 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You have responses.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  20:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:99logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:99logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for notifying me. I would like to know if what I did is correct. User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 13:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

99 (app) history
Thanks for making 99 (app). I have put the article into a section history, but it doesn't have anything in between 2012 and 2017 so if you are wondering what to work on next that could be your focus. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Hugo (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugo (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hugo (software)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:08, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hugo (software)


A tag has been placed on Hugo (software), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:09, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Donetsk Republic (political party). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Was there any reason you undid an edit removing commas that are not usually meant to be in the ideology-section of a party infobox? '' Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Hi sorry for the misunderstanding. I noticed that the infobox code was broken and attempted to fix it. User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 14:16, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah ok, sorry to bother you. I just thought it was a little bit suspicious at the moment i saw it. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 17:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)