User talk:Tetraxho

Voynich Manuscript edits
Hi Tetraxho, my apologies for the undo (and edit summary typo) over at this article. It's an interesting theory, no doubt, but we need to show that it has enough coverage in reliable sources that it merits mention in the article; if we included every theory out there, the article would be incredibly overlong and unreadable! Now that two editors have undone your addition, I would respectfully say you should start a discussion on the talk page and try to achieve consensus before re-adding. Have a nice day. Dumuzid (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you Dumuzid, I admit I am not too aware of the editing process here, even though I have had a user account for many years- I have not suggested many edits. I can understand there are many more Voynich theories out there, too numerous to list. I have added my original edits to my talk page, and hopefully someone can review them. Thank you and have a great day. Tetraxho (talk) 18:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * While there's nothing wrong with adding the information to your userpage, it might be more helpful if you did so at the article talk page, under a heading of something like "proposed addition" or the like. If enough people there agree with inclusion in the article, then you won't have to pay attention to my reticence at all!  Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)