User talk:Tetuben

August 2021
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Lina Hidalgo. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Do not reinsert vague allegations like this again. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

– Muboshgu (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lina Hidalgo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Is there any way to discuss with you? I'm only getting one-way comms from you. The story with link is a valid story ongoing pertinent and relevant. You seem biases and engaging in censorship of the truth. The truth you say in your bio that you hold high. You are being oppressing and unfair. Your bias is skewing WikiPedia.
 * Yes, of course we can have a discussion. I've been trying to get you to engage in discussion rather than edit warring. Your edit is trying to cast aspersions on Hidalgo based on a disagreement she is having with a county commissioner. You seem to be accusing her of impropriety that is not supported by the sources. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

I find no way to send message. Nothing I see looks like able to respond. I'm not trying to disrupt anything. Truly think a relevant story about current issues is going on. Trying not to put a political spin on it; just the facts. I see all kinds of entries for Republicans and Conservatives that go way over what I'm trying to add. Smears, false narratives, etc etc and when I attempt to add a real story for Harris County Judge Hidalgo, I'm met with admonitions. Ben Rousseau tetuben93@gmail.com
 * We strive to maintain neutral point of view on all pages. That doesn't mean "neutral" in the sense that you are thinking. It means a "neutral" assessment of the sources. What I can see is that Lina Hidalgo approved $11 million for COVID vaccine outreach and the county commissioner is taking issue with the firm that Hidalgo chose. That is not what you added in the page initially. In your last edit, it's worded as an admonition against Hidalgo in a manner that isn't neutral. Beyond that, it's not clear how significant this is for her biography. It seems like the normal goings on of government. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

By your answer then do you mean to say you will correct the many articles on Republicans that slight them on WikiPedia, politically? It is information. It is factual. It calls into question things. Person you are used to sketchy govt deals and payoffs as normal, and that is certainly not "neutral." It is clear you are placing your subjectivity onto this issue. How about this then: treat her as you would a Republican's article. Pick any conservative at random to see clearly the bias against them...even politically to slight them.

Plus, doling out major contract to political insiders, yes the firm she chose. That many would see as a political payoff to a crony. That is sketchy most would say. Unless one attempts to shield from taint that is. And that is enough to warrant a note in WikiPedia. I am sorry that she is on your political team and you want to cover up for it, but as you say if you value truth, then this is worthy of a note.


 * You clearly have a WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality and a refusal to collaborate to reach a consensus. I'm blocking your account indefinitely. You can appeal the block and an WP:UNINVOLVED admin will assess it. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

So truth not something your support. Call me names. "Battleground" mentality. You sure that's not you and your bias? I've just been reading articles on Republicans with all kinds of slanderous language, political entries, to use your words that "seem like govt as usual." Yet phrases like right-wing strewn all over them. My issue with your bias is the inequality of application. Open roads to smear Republicans, while Democrat get a shield. WikiPedia has ruined it's credibility. If is who you edit your platform, then none of the information can be trusted. And to add insult to injury you blame me and call me names and accuse me of being the wrong one. Not good.
 * I called you no names. I addressed only your behavior. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Talking with you reminds me of talking with a govt employee. I can totally see you doing the number on the phone, "Sir, I'm not going to argue with you," at top of your voice so all around you think guy on the phone is arguing. You're being completely dishonest. All I did was attempt to place news story and you talk about my behavior. I may not know the ins and outs of details of mechanics of WikiPedia, but my add was the truth. Some times I tried to find a way to overcome your one-way suppression. I could find no way to talk with you. Even your repeated appeal process on blocking went no place with no option to send anything (that I could figure out). A good way to deal with my entry was "I see you're trying to add something. The way you are doing it doesn't really work. This is the process." No, you simply chucked out the story and told me I was being disruptive. So much for your "truth." You are the definition of censorship, suppression and oppression. Your stand is, "I don't agree with you, I am the admin, so you will get shut down." Especially in light of all the unequal negative treatment by WikiPedia for any article of political person of the opposite party and Conservatives. Your words would carry some weight if WikiPedia treated Conservatives the same way you've been talking to be about how you're treating a Democrat. And to yes, you have been labeling me as something I am not. Semantics and sophistry for your to say you've not called me names. No, just the entire overriding and dismissing me and the true news coverage. Now when I see WikiPedia articles show up online I can only think, Wow that's not going to be correct. All because you personally have a biased political agenda. See how you damage free speech? See how censorship stops free speech? I said nothing untrue, I made no attacks. Sad thing is that you as a Democrat do not care. No matter how much play acting you engage in. No matter how much faux pearl clutching you pretend at. Now, go out there and wonder why folks don't want to take the COVID vaccination, or why knuckle draggers see the politicization of a real virus and simply do not trust the Left and the govt. You won't see it that way though. To you, we are simply ignorant rubes. So it's ok in your mind to shut us down. That is wrong of you. Simply wrong.

I checked in to see if you fixed the biased against Republicans in WikiPedia, but no. You say words to me of "neutral" yet I see article after article smearing Conservatives. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Brnovich. I get it. You all are a Democrat organization. If you unblock me for trying to tell the truth, I will not edit any Democrat's articles. I will leave you WikiPedia Democrats to cover up the truth, to engage in lies and misinformation. You have shown me what you are all about. I get it. You are way too big for me to take on. I simply will be out here knowing what liars and disseminators of misinformation and false narratives you engage in. Just know, your face has been uncovered. And I talk. I talk to many people. You'll go untouched, but are you really? Have you done good for people, for the world, for the truth? No. I will ask you to remove "truth" and how important you think truth is, from your bio. I may end here, but you and I both know the actual truth.

Learning now that Lina Hidalgo has removed insider $11 Million contract with one-person shop when information about University of Texas requested to run the program at $7.5 Million. So your bias of covering up govt corruption of a Democrat is disgusting. And your continued oppression of me is absolutely wrong. You are wrong.

Here is yet another random Republican skewed against. Not "neutral" at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hogan_Gidley

Nonsense. You're telling untruths about me to bolster your biased position. That is disingenuous and dishonest of you. Personally.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michale_Graves --- As another example of bias, WikiPedia notes Conservative politics of a punk rock musician, yet when I attempt to link to a real newspaper story about an actual politician you block me and shut me down and say "He is clearly not here to make an encyclopedia," or some such nonsense. I'm grown enough as a human to get the score. I'm fine/not fine with being unfairly blocked without good cause by you personally. It's just so wrong. WikiPedia puts itself up as a source of information, truth even, yet that is absolutely not what WikiPedia is about! WikiPedia information cannot be trusted at any level. Seeing behind the curtain taints your entire entity. And that is on you, personally. I attempted different ways to add items, different ways to get to discuss with you/WikiPedia, there is not easy way to communicate. So if you have some example of me saying something untoward or unfitting, it was in an attempt to contact you to discuss. And then you block me. Done. Period. Nothing more. Your bias rules the day. There is even no easy or convenient way to go around you and your bias. No one person should have that much power. It may be intoxicating that you shut me down, but the damage you do it longer-lasting than simply some guy with different opinions being censored.

Seems you are comfortable with lying. I am not. It is sad more than anything else.

Looked at a random Republican article about Greg Travis, Houston. Seems like Wikipedia lists all kinds of extracurricular points that you blocked me for attempting to enter a link on a Democrat: "In December 2020, Travis faced criticism for posting an internet meme on his personal Facebook account depicting Michelle Obama and Melania Trump, the meme portrayed Melania Trump in a positive manner while portraying Michelle Obama in a negative manner.[7]

Policies Travis is affiliated with the Republican Party.[8]

Overall, Travis believes that city government should be fiscally responsible and a "sturdy but quiet force."[3] He was an opponent of the Houston HERO ordinance that was intended to be an anti-discrimination ordinance for LGBTQ Houstonians.[6]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Travis_(politician) o Criminal investigation has been started by Harris County over the insider corruption deal by Lina Hidalo. As much wrong information, smears, and skewing on Wikipedia pages of Republicans, adding a real story about a politician is a valid encyclopedia entry. I am truly sorry you are shielding your political team from the truth getting out on them. That's on you.