User talk:TexasDex/Archive01

Revision3 Studios
Hi. I noticed that you voted to keep the Systm article on Votes_for_deletion/Systm. Well, unfortunately, the article was deleted, and Systm was redirected to Kevin Rose. I recently created a new article for Revision3 Studios, the company that produces System and thebroken, and changed Systm to redirect there. Unfortunately, the Revision3 Studios article has now been nominated for deletion.

So, if you have a chance, please look at the Revision3 Studios article, and then go to Votes for deletion/Revision3 Studios and vote to keep it. Thanks a lot, --taestell 16:56, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

GNAA delete vote
I don't think Theresa did this on purpose. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:09, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

It was an error on my part. I am really sorry. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 06:21, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

GNAA x 2
There is a comment up the top. They can't miss it! But I agree that 6 times is too many. This will be the last vote. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:24, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up
It certainly shouldn't have been removed (I didn't notice this!). I have:


 * readded the notice
 * noted what I've done on the talk page
 * noted the issue on WP:AN
 * made a comment on Gmaxwell's page.

The way I see it, anyone who relists that article on AfD is being disruptive. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:33, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the kudos
Specifically, my first barnstar! It's much appreciated, and I'm glad to see you've liked the Puhdys, Tamara Danz, and Silly (band) articles. I hope I'll get around to finishing the first of these and working on others, like City (band), Pankow (German band), Renft, and Stern-Combo Meißen at some point... Regards, ProhibitOnions 15:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Kinsey
You removed this paragraph from Alfred Kinsey with a single sentence of justification in the edit summary.

Alfred Kinsey's two volumes became the manifestoes of sexual revolution and the counterculture. However, That was not the intention of the scientist from Indiana. Kinsey, himself, was a life long Republican, and his research was sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation, established by the moderately conservative Rockefeller Family.

I disagree with this edit for two reasons: The paragraph doesn't explicitly state that he was conservative, just that he was a member of the Republican Party (which is verifiable and factual, and could be ) and that he did not intend the massive social change that his papers caused (also can be verified (or refuted) with sources). Perhaps the "manifestoes" part could be re-worded, but I think it's certainly important to acknowledge the social effects of the reports. Unless you can convince me otherwise, I'm re-inserting the text, because I think it's removal takes away from the article, and possibly compromises the NPOV. --TexasDex 07:31, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Read the talk page! I put the expanation there when I did it. The paragraph implies with an anachronism--his association with the Republican party (which most liberals and progressives were members of until the late 60s and early 70s) and the political orientation of the politically neutral Rockefeller Foundation. The use of the word manifesto is riduculous. If you can rewrite the paragraph so that anachronistic interpretation of his political associations isn't likely to be made and using a different word than manifesto, and without making the ridiculously weak inference that because the Rockefeller foundation was established by a conservative family everyone they fund must be conservative, and leave whatever useful information there might be in the paragraph (of which I'm hard pressed to find.) then rewrite it. Check the talk pages first, I put all this in there. --Brentt 23:18, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Cystic fibrosis on WP:MCOTW
Cystic fibrosis, which you voted for, has been selected as the Medicine Collaboration of the Week. You are invited to help improve it! &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 04:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Thebroken
Hey thanks for the headsup on thebroken blanking issue. I'll keep my eye out if it happens again. --Hoovernj 21:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Work
I don't think editing wikipedia while you're at work constitutes as work per se. Unless your boss told you to edit the Drexel wiki page. Which I doubt. --You know who.

Poison Dart Frog Naming
Hi,

I am currently working on improving the articles about the poison dart frogs. I have started by creating all the genus articles, but something has struck me while I was working on them. Almost all of the species articles are titled by their scientific name. According to the Tree of Life guidelines, articles should be named by their common name, and if their is none, by their scientific name. I noticed that you created some of the articles, and I would like your opinion in the discussion on Talk:Poison dart frog. It would be easier to reach consensus about all the articles in one place than to have to do it on each individual page. Thankyou. --liquidGhoul 00:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Cyanide and Happiness
Dont really see how its biased but its all from the FAQ at explosm.net. but ya try to make it look better--Nimrod1234 22:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I actually didn't write about the allegations on TopWebComics, just clarified the formating of it. However, I do understand that veracity seems to be the biggest issue "deleters" bring up regarding the comic strip, so I'll hunt it down if I can.bernlin2000 &infin; 15:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

AfD closing
Thanks for cleaning up after me. - brenneman  color="black" title="Admin actions">{L} 22:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

WP Philadelphia
--evrik 16:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Have you seen this, Philadelphia Meetup? --evrik 16:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Check this out Meetup/Philadelphia_2. --evrik (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)



Reply
Just letting you know that I replied on my talk page, assuming you're not watching it. Templationist 13:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cyanide and Happiness pianist.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cyanide and Happiness pianist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:DaddySausage.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:DaddySausage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Camp Hill High School
Thanks for your comments regarding my work on the CHHS page. I will tell though, that I actually wrote all of the history content on the Camp Hill School District homepage, when I was a senior at the school in 2000. I helped build the 2nd version of the school district website (the first version was developed in '97 by members of the class of '99) and wrote complete background histories of all of the schools. I still have the content on disk somewhere. So in reality, the history content isn't plagarism; however, I completely understand where your coming from and can except your reasoning for paraphrasing it. You did a good job with it. Take care, Wrightchr 01:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

sorry I missed the CF vandalism
Hi there, sorry I missed the vandalism in the CF article, I thought that the anon user had removed all of his/her changes, but I guess I wasn't looking hard enough. Thanks for catching and removing the vandalism. --Kyok o 07:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Barbara Kingsolver
Though my last edit to the Barbara Kingsolver page was deleted, I was wondering if I would be able to create a new section under the title "Controversial Feminism," seeing as how the vast majority of the male characters in Kingsolver's novels are portrayed in the most negative light possible. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Poon dawg (talk • contribs) 09:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC).

Deployment Diagram article picture
In your example of a Deployment Diagram, would it make more sense for the Web Browser to be a component within a node named something like Computer? Error9900 07:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Meetup
If possible, stop by the meetup page. This is coming up soon and we need to finalize and get invites out. ike9898 23:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Marra's
That should be expanded. --216.54.22.220 04:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on GSI commerce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 14:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/GSI_Commerce
I moved this listing from May 13 to May 14 because the signature on your comment is on the 14th and today is the 14th. Nardman1 02:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, it was 2 hours ago. :P Nardman1 02:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cape0002.jpg
Hello, TexasDex. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Cape0002.jpg) was found at the following location: User:TexasDex/Cyanide and Happiness. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Portrait.PNG
Hello TexasDex, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Portrait.PNG) was found at the following location: User:TexasDex/Cyanide and Happiness. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Don't Eat the Pictures VHS.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Don't Eat the Pictures VHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 20:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Philadelphia Invite

 * Could you email me? --evrik (talk) 15:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
 * Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
 * Join our mailing list
 * Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com

Thanks and I hope you join up!  Cbrown1023   talk   04:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:KinseyTIME.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:KinseyTIME.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 22:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Given the ongoing discussion which I'm sure you haven't checked, I would suggest you add the Time article as a source to the Alfred Kinsey wiki article. Especially since you did, in fact, use it as a source when writing it. --ImmortalGoddezz 15:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Since you obviously can't be bothered to do it, despite prodding on my part, I've done it for you. --ImmortalGoddezz 17:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Deletion review: Image:KinseyTIME.jpg
I believe the image was deleted entirely against the clear language and spirit of our deletion policy and guidelines. Here's the deletion review I initiated:. Best, Dan—DCGeist 06:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)