User talk:Textwriter 1

AfC notification: Draft:Josh Stanley has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Josh Stanley. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Other accounts
Have you also used the account ? -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)


 * no I haven't Textwriter 1 (talk) 16:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for replying. My concern is related to the improper use of more than one account, which is usually forbidden. We have ways to check whether the accounts are related, so now is the time to come clean and resolve the matter without getting blocked. If you lie, both accounts will likely be blocked and editing of the article blocked to you. (I'm already considering deleting the article, so this can get touchy.) The use of more than one account (IPs also count) happens to newbies here, and we'd like to give you a chance to fix this before proceeding to an official check user request. If that step is taken, a block may follow.
 * So I'll ask this in a different way. Are the accounts related, IOW, is the same person using both accounts? We'll know if you're lying. We can see IPs, which devices are used, locations, times, your searches, and which operating system(s) used. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello again :)
 * I am new to Wikipedia and trying to lern the ropes but I am 100% sur that "Troublemaker" isn't my account! I only have this one. Textwriter 1 (talk) 09:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Josh Stanley


A tag has been placed on Josh Stanley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I would like to contest the speedy deletion. I believe the language and sources to be valid proof to showcase the notoriety of the person chosen "Josh Stanley". Textwriter 1 (talk) 22:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello Textwriter 1. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Josh Stanley, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Textwriter 1. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, I am in no way payed to write on wikipedia! This project of "Josh Stanley" started in university as part of my bachelors where I had to write about a known figure from my country. I will admit I hired someone to post the source page as I didn't know how wikipedia functioned. My wikipedia page got deleted as I didn't have enough sources or material to showcase the "notoriety" at the time. But I feel confident that I have shown enough recognition this time. Textwriter 1 (talk) 22:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)