User talk:Tezwoo

Invitation
Invitation to enter your counsels in Talk:Josip Broz TitoTeo Pitta (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Puppet
Hello. I would like to inform you that the user Special:Contributions/72.66.12.17 is a puppet who came from Serbian Wikipedia since he got blocked indefinitely over there. See here. He is a puppet of another user that got banned for disruptive behavior. See here. He now turned to English Wikipedia and shows the same attitude that already got him blocked 2 times. Detoner (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, I also reinforce that. 72.66.12.17 also contributed to the debate under the Nikola Tesla article with a very rude behavior considering Croatians or Hungarians with a very stuck-up pedantry, but of course when his stupidities were demonstrated he/she could answer only with a blatant primitivity. Please guard the Croatia_in_the_union_with_Hungary article, of course we Hungarians acknowledge Croatia as a separate country that we had a personal union with. We don't care about some non-experts POWs, even they are able to be cited by the Wikipedia rules what they think about Croatia and Hungary's relation. We have the original documents, the laws and we have the common history, we know better what happened between us than some ignorant outsiders. Regards(KIENGIR (talk) 22:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC))

Hello, again. I think something should be done with the mentioned editor. He is being very disruptive on Military Froniter article. I've done my part and the research but the sock puppet report has prolonged. Detoner (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Military Froniter
Hello. I noticed you were active on Military Frontier article. Could you consider sharing your opinion in this discussion. I wanted to introduce a simple edit, which itself is a direct quote from the source listed in the article, but another user keeps objecting irrationally. He even claims the source says something which it does not, and when I ask him to provide a quote, he refuses. I really do not know what to do since no other editors are joining, although I invited some who participate in the editing. If no one joins I will be forced to oped a RfC, which by itself is not necessary, since the sources are in consistence with the edit. Thank you. Detoner (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Tzowu, would you please join the discussion in Military Froniter talk page. The other editor is behaving very strangely and I don't think us two can reach a consensus. I'm on the verge to accuse him of lying because he constantly repeats that the source says something and refuses to provide a quote. Of course, his claim is completely false. Now he is reverting me with the same argumentation. What is more strange is that he is leaving the very same claim he is disputing in the article. You added the Horvat's quote in the article which he is disputing, but he is reverting my edit and not yours. I simply can't deal with that irrational behavior all by myself. Thank you. Detoner (talk) 21:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

I guess you haven't read this yet. The mentioned ip is a puppet, and not only that but several editors already warned of his disruptive behavior. He is also banned from Serbian Wikipedia. I don't think you will be able to lead a normal discussion with him, so I haven't even tried, nor I had reverted his nonsense. I'm awaiting the report to get processed. <b style="color:navy">Detoner</b> (<b style="color:blue">talk</b>) 00:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

I would like your support for this edit. FkpCascais had reverted me with the argumentation that both you and I disagreed with. I think we both agree there is a formal and administrative aspect to Military Froniter. I would like to explain it a little better. What do you think of it? If you do not agree, I'm sure we two can reach a consensus. I simply can't deal with FkpCascais's disruptive behavior. He already dragged me in edit warring for nothing, and I know I won't be able to do anything without the support of at least one editor. He objected with the reasoning that the Horvat's quote is speaking of Sabor's demands and not of the kings proclamation. The strange thing is that he left your edit (which is against his claim) in the article and only reverted my elaboration that had not introduced any new claims. Ok, now when you agree that the Horvat's quote is speaking of the kings proclamation we have a consensus and I could do that edit again, but I know he will revert me again, and he obviously knows how to win edit warring, so I need your support on this. I really can't deal with that disruptive behavior alone. <b style="color:navy">Detoner</b> (<b style="color:blue">talk</b>) 00:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Personal attack
Hello. I'm being accused of POV pushing for the edit that you entered in the article (Horvat). Could you please share your opinion here. Thank you. <b style="color:navy">Detoner</b> (<b style="color:blue">talk</b>) 21:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Another edit warring on sight
Hello, I'm again being reverted by the same user on the simplest edit and I feel he will again go to edit warring. Could you possibly resolve this since you were also involved in that article? I think that it is wrong to call much older symbol "Ilirian" only because they had used it in the 19th century. I have nothing against stating that in the corresponding article, but this is an article unrelated to the Ilirian movement that belongs to the 19th century. Thank you. <b style="color:navy">Detoner</b> (<b style="color:blue">talk</b>) 12:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Dujam II Frankopan
I've created the Dujam II Frankopan article but I used only Hungarian sources. If you will have time, could you expand the article with Croatian sources (even his wars with Venice is important, but I could not find any data in English or Hungarian). --Norden1990 (talk) 18:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I think I found a Hungarian source about his Venetian conflict. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Logotip Mosta nezavisnih lista
Tzowu, ne mislim ulaziti u uređivačke ratove, ali logotip je lijepo definiran u statutu Mosta (čak sam stavio i poveznicu), tako da mi je nejasno zašto vraćaš staru verziju logotipa.-- Ma  ▀ ▄  Ga  16:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Could use your help!
Hello, the page Anti-Croat Sentiment could use you help in formatting and cleaning up. In dealing with vandalism it needs all the help it can get. Thanks Stariradio (talk) 16:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

RfC on Tito
An RfC that might interest you is going on Talk:Josip Broz Tito. --Silvio1973 (talk) 10:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Republic of Ragusa
I noticed the slow moving dispute at Republic of Ragusa over language. I have warned one of the repeat IPs. Take care not to edit war and it'd help to add a note about the dispute on the talk page. Fences &amp;  Windows  21:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

László Bárdossy article
Hi, there is an ongoing discussion regarding a material with Croatia. It is in a friendly manner with an Ausralian Wikipedian, he cited a source that is stating something that is not true, at least may be heavily misunderstood. I also invited some Hungarian Wikipedians interested in history, if there is something about Croatia, you are on the first place by me. Please check the last section of the talk page (there also the last four posts) and feel free to manifest if needed. Moreover I kindly ask you to supervise Hungarian-Croatian materials in the future regarding the Medimurje, Prekmurje, Croatian Baranja and Independent State of Croatia arcticles, even if not yet, but soon they will be also checked for validity regarding Hungarian affairs. Thank you in advance, Cheers (KIENGIR (talk) 09:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC))

Mind explaining
this revert you did? I had opened a discussion on talk page. 89.164.239.52 (talk) 23:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Because both the Graz and Karađorđevo meetings are already mentioned in the body of the article, in a neutral point of view. Tzowu (talk) 01:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I know. I wanted to point out that this article says the thing that I had posted.141.138.18.95 (talk) 09:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Natasa Dusev-Janics
Hi,

a recent edit has been removed the "Croats of Vojvodina" category from the subject. As we know, she is of also Croatian origin - Hungarian wiki says of "Serbian-Croatian origin". Please reinforce or cease the information, I plan to re-add the removed category if you reinforce it's validity. Thank You! (KIENGIR (talk) 21:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC))

Republic of Ragusa
Watch out for 178.222.116.11, he is vandelising pages. Rewriting histories. He's been doing this on the World War II In Yugoslavia and List of Wars Involving Serbia modern and middle ages as well. 108.54.93.183 (talk) 18:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Flags of Croatia
What's the difference between "" and ""? --151.65.81.179 (talk) 14:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Hasenbegovic
Hi, Tzowu. I would recommend that you request semi-protection for the article. Best, 23 editor (talk) 22:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

hr.wiki
Hoćeš li ponekad navratiti? :) --MateoKatanaCRO (talk) 12:33, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Operation Storm
I would like you to join the discussion on the talk page. Thank you.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 11:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

RfC closure
Can you please close this RfC? The thing is starting to become tiresome. --3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 09:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Congrats
Hi,

Congratulations for your national football team for the victory against us!(KIENGIR (talk) 17:40, 15 October 2019 (UTC)) For the final qualification as well!(KIENGIR (talk) 23:48, 19 November 2019 (UTC))

Croatia proper
Hi,

please check on the subject the last two recent edits...is it OR? Croatia Proper I think historically has been called as Croatia, and not central-Croatia (that may be a present view...?). Thanks(KIENGIR (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC))

Socialist Republic of Croatia
Hi, I would like to reply to the comment that you put on the mentioned page, but I have been banned so I think I will have to refrain from doing that. Nbanic (talk) 20:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

RfC Discussion
Hello there is an RfC for a discussion on the Talk:Ante Pavelić talk page involving a topic discussion you took part of. Please have a look. OyMosby (talk) 03:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Ivan Gundulić
Hi. Why this was deleted with sources by the user Vineword which they blocked ....Croatian scholars and the Matica hrvatska reject Serbian claims of dual belonging, and they assert "the already known Serbian claiming and reaving of Croatian culture" let someone revert to a previous state when he did not delete it. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.138.27.88 (talk) 06:37, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * As you can see, I'm mostly alone there with Mikola and a bunch of banned users which would probably support my edits, and I can't break three reverts in 24 hours (or close to that). Make an account and start contributing if you are interested in these topics. Tezwoo (talk) 18:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Another Damir Karbić articles
Croatian historian Damir Karbić uploaded his several publications on Academia.edu right now, including his papers about the Šubić family: Diplomacy of the Šubići Regarding Relations Between Neapolitan Angevins, the Papacy and Venice at the End of the Thirteenth and in the First Decades of the Fourteenth Century, [https://www.academia.edu/43270495/Common_cult_and_religious_elements_in_the_history_of_a_noble_kindred._The_case_study_of_the_%C5%A0ubi%C4%87i_of_Bribir Common cult and religious elements in the history of a noble kindred. The case study of the Šubići of Bribir] and others in Croatian and Hungarian language. Perhaps, these papers could be useful to further expand the article of Paul Šubić. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:55, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Heads-up
Just a heads-up that a user has completely rewritten the Bugojno ethnic cleansing article about the ARBiH ethnic cleansing of Croats from Bugojno to suggest that there was no systemic ethnic cleansing of Croats. Thought you might be interested. Cheers. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Request
I request your opinion in Talk:Josip_Broz_Tito. Regards--Forza bruta (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Operation Storm
Hi Tezwoo. In the Operation Storm article I noticed two different editors added content about “chauvinism” and the Ustase genocide against the Serbs [1 ] and [2 ]. However I don’t see what connection that has with Operation Storm, Milosevic, Tudjman or the war of the 90s. And while cited sources confirm obviously the genocide happened it doesn't connect it with the article’s subject. It seems to me there is an axe to grind to bring up the Genocide in relativizing with crimes done in the 90s. The former one seems to be banned for biased edits. Does it make sense to you or am I missing something? As I see no discussion of the genocide waged by the Chetniks. Thanks. OyMosby (talk) 22:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * None of that was in the article when it got its GA status . The article in its current state would easily lose the GA status just by comparing it with that diff. I generally don't like it when articles about a battle go overly into detail about the entire war, starting with day 1, and even about the events decades before it. Tezwoo (talk) 23:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Should it be removed? I can already see accusations of Ustase sympathizing. I’m just so tired of seeing the articles become nationalist battlegrounds hoping to sway the reading public for Team A or Team B. OyMosby (talk) 23:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Input
What is you take on this section [Here ]? The last half was added few months ago and seems a bit undue. Maybe it is relevant for the section. I’m not sure. OyMosby (talk) 21:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * These issues should be solved on the main article first, starting with the fringe death toll of 500,000. Tezwoo (talk) 21:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ” Historian Stanley G. Payne claimed that direct and indirect executions by NDH regime were an "extraordinary mass crime", which in proportionate terms exceeded any other European regime beside Hitler's Third Reich while Jonathan Steinberg stated that the crimes against Serbs in the NDH were the "earliest total genocide to be attempted during World War II" .He added the crimes in the NDH were proportionately surpassed only by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and several of the extremely genocidal African regimes.” How relevant is this for a summary on the Genocides in History page?OyMosby (talk) 21:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't know, perhaps not as other instances of genocides listed there are much more concise in their summaries. Tezwoo (talk) 22:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speaking of Genocides, heads up there seems to be a new user knee deep in revisionism on the Genocide template and Chetnik Crimes pages Such as here for example . A look at their history shows not good intentions. Just a heads up.OyMosby (talk) 01:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It's hard to keep watch on all of those peripheral articles/lists. Tezwoo (talk) 21:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello
Do you have an email I could contact you with? I have some questions about some sources. Thanks OyMosby (talk) 03:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Also please look at what seems like IP puppets battling on the Grubori massacre article.OyMosby (talk) 15:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * yes, you can send me an e-mail of course: Tezwoo (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will email in the future Wiki related questions and concerns. Some you deal with as well. I give up on the Grubori massacre talk page honestly. But personal matters have popped up. The biggest currently my father is in hospital after suffering a major heart attack. So I will be taking a break from Wikipedia for a while. Don’t know how long. Take care and stay in good health. Hvala ti puno brate. OyMosby (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I hope your father gets well. Stay safe. Tezwoo (talk) 22:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you Tezwoo. And stay safe as well. OyMosby (talk) 03:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Ante Pavlic Talk Page
Tezwoo could you clarify your vote on the RfC as your Yes vote was not counted being it was yes for Yugoslav not Yugoslav Croat? Please take a look as it looks to me The RfC is a bit flawed. The last vote which was a “no” vote came 2 months later and THEN the voting was closed. Seems ridiculous to me. OyMosby (talk) 19:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Missing cites in 1940 Croatian local elections
Hi, the article cites "Lakic, pp. 24–25", "Regan, p. 399" and "Regan, p. 399 f5", "Mirosevic 2016", "Hrstić, p. 86", "Dizdar 2006", and "Hrvatski Branik 1 June 1940" -- but no such references are listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Thanks, Renata (talk) 02:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Cadastral municipalities of Croatia
Hello, can you please make a map of Croatia divided into cadastral municipalities? Thanks in advance. Kaštel Stari (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, so I will give you two links: https://www.katastar.hr/en/#/ and https://geoportal.nipp.hr/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/d1c956e1-437c-42d8-b1bc-fa9953269ce2. I think this will be helpful. Kaštel Stari (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

I understand but I am not looking for a single cadastral parcel, but a larger entity called a cadastral municipality. They do not have identification numbers but have general names such as Seget Gornji or Split. If you know what I mean? Kaštel Stari (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok, great, so what do you need from me? List of these identification numbers (matični brojevi)? Kaštel Stari (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Well when I started the search using katastar.hr, I did get the list of all cadastral municipalities identification numbers and the I could get the exact location of them, is that what you need? Kaštel Stari (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Did you find it? Kaštel Stari (talk) 20:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Wonderful news, can you upload it in SVG format? Kaštel Stari (talk) 13:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Great, thank you so much! Kaštel Stari (talk) 13:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok, great. Thanks once again. Kaštel Stari (talk) 19:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Can I ask you about another map? It's this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wind_patterns_in_Adriatic_Sea.png Can you make it in SVG? Kaštel Stari (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the map, Tezwoo! I tried but I was not able to get the vector data. Can you tell me how did you get the data if possible? Thanks --Ikonact (talk) 16:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Tezwoo! You are an expert in military history can you join the discussion here []. These are changes [].And on this second page a lot of it has been deleted, so if you can check. []. These are changes []. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.78.117 (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Another user already made the change as I can see. A lot of OR issues on both pages. Tezwoo (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok, just look here there can be changes and you know best in editing and talking to other editors if the changes are ok [] there can be changes and you know best in editing and talking to other editors if the changes are okay.I'm the same, I only write to other destinations from another computer.Bye 93.138.59.173 (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Tezwoo Look at this more i won't change because i don't know. Is it [] reliable source? These are changes [] .Thank you .Bye93.142.78.117 (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I've never heard of that person, but the sentence sourced to her doesn't seem controversial, regarding the involvement of the UN. Tezwoo (talk) 21:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

History of Croatia
Hello! Do you know anything about some kind of "Ottoman Croatia"? User Cemsentin1 has made changes Ottoman conquest in Croatia begun with fall of Imotski in 1492. In imotski page write this Imotski was held by the Turks from the fall of Bosnia in 1492 until 1717 when it was captured by the Venetians, does not write anything about the fall of Croatia. "Ottoman Croatia" does not exist, because it has never fallen that the Croatian rulers served her that she could be called "Ottoman Croatia" [],can you fix this. Goodbye — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.71.129 (talk) 18:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You are right, there was no entity called "Ottoman Croatia". Tezwoo (talk) 21:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Knin
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Knin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 15:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

hello
Hi just wanted to say your name is cool from --Ilikememes128 (talk) 21:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Ilikememes128 (talk) 21:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Knin
The article Siege of Knin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Knin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Siege of Gvozdansko
You declared Ottoman rule in Gvozdansko ended in 1685. However, Ottomans regained it in 1690 after retaking Üsküp and Belgrade, region of Kosovo, eastern parts of Syrmia and Slavonia from Austrians and held until Treaty of Passarowitz in 1718 Cemsentin1 (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Gvozdansko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glina. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Gvozdansko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanizsa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

TROGIR CENSUS
THE 1880 CENSUS of the link is about the district of Trogir. The district had a croatian majority. In the city of Trogir the popoulation was mostly italian speaking.

Source: "Guerrino Perselli, I censimenti della popolazione dell'Istria, con Fiume e Trieste e di alcune città della Dalmazia tra il 1850 e il 1936, Centro di Ricerche Storiche - Rovigno, Unione Italiana - Fiume, Università Popolare di Trieste, Trieste-Rovigno, 1993"

87.0.41.26 (talk) 15:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * It's certainly possible that the city had a majority of Italian speakers in 1880, but we need a page number in the source you are citing so that the information can be verified. Tezwoo (talk) 18:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, see these changes from this user [] who writes without a source on this page and no one deletes that [] it must be a suckpuppet [][].89.172.58.27 (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The user was blocked as a sockpuppet. Tezwoo (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Frankopan family
Greeting! You know the history, can you see if these last edits are correct []93.138.141.244 (talk) 07:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Milan Bandić
Do you think that Bandić's article is now suitable for GA? I'm curious because the article is NPOV and well-referenced now. Vacant0 (talk) 00:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Military Frontier, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kassa and Kanizsa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Greeting! I see that you know Croatian history and that you are editing it. Can you check if some Croatian rulers wrote it correctly in the article.[] Thank you and goodbye.93.138.14.13 (talk) 23:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Greetings. Unfortunately, I don't know. I've never researched the genealogy of nobility. Tezwoo (talk) 23:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Tezwoo
Here they want to put Bosnia and Herzegovina and other things that have never been Serbian countries, please pay attention to this page and further possible edits []. Thank you.89.172.66.209 (talk) 06:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Gvozdansko
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Gvozdansko you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 08:00, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Gvozdansko
The article Siege of Gvozdansko you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Siege of Gvozdansko for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 21:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Gvozdansko
The article Siege of Gvozdansko you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Gvozdansko for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 07:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)