User talk:Tfirey

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dick Clark 16:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Oscar Marion, nominated for deletion
Under the rules of good faith on Wikipedia, I am notifying your of my nomination to delete the article that you created in December 2006 Oscar Marion. I have nominated the article uder the following reasons:
 * Wikipedia Rules Regarding Original Research - Wikipedia is not a place to publish original research. This is one of the keystones of Wikipedia.
 * Unsourced - Other than the link to the United States Senate Web Page on the art collection in the US Senate Collection, your article does not provide any other documentation.
 * Unverifiable Sources - The article on Oscar does not contain any stated primary source material - documents that can be verified by others. If such documents are available, they needto be stated in the article itself.

If you have any questions, comments or concerns, please share them on the articles deletion discussion talk page. Stude62 01:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Oscar Marion
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Oscar Marion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 01:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Removing Deletion Tag from Oscar Marion
I have reverted your edit changes to article Oscar Marion that removed the deletion tag for that article by reinsterting into the article.

In general, once an article is entered into review for such an action, it is considered bad form to remove the tag. As the article creator, I understand the feelings of ownership that you have invested in the article's topic, however WIKIPEDIA does have rules and guidelines that should be followed, and as such I would ask that you refrain from additional edits that would remove the tag from the article until the process has run its course. Stude62 18:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

The start of the Great Depression
You are invited to share your thoughts at the article's talk page: Talk:Great Depression. See you there! Binksternet (talk) 18:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Great Depression. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)