User talk:Tfk57

Your edits to Constitution Center (Washington, D.C.)
Hi, I've reverted your removal of information from Constitution Center (Washington, D.C.). I see in your edit summary that you claim it's slanderous, but as far as I can tell, all the information is sourced to reliable sources. Unless you can explain on the article's talk page that the information you're removing is false and how you know that (it would have to be false per reliable sources, not per "I just know"), then we can't allow you to remove sourced information from the article just because you don't like it. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 12:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Constitution Center (Washington, D.C.). Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.