User talk:Tfrosy

Speedy deletion nomination of Jennifer Vanderpool


A tag has been placed on Jennifer Vanderpool, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 99.136.254.88 (talk) 00:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: acceptable formats for an encyclopedic biography
Hi, I'm sure you intend well, but the version you've offered is unacceptable as a Wikipedia article, both as blatant promotion and as consisting nearly completely of quotes. Please restore it to its previous version; I've already requested help at the biographies of living persons noticeboard, because I think it may merit saving. But not in this form..... 99.136.254.88 (talk) 01:00, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * What I'd suggest is cutting all the quotes, but include footnoted links to the reviews, perhaps under 'external links'. If any of the reviews contain biographical material, then you can use them as references to support content in the article. If I did it you'll think I'm vandalizing your work, but it really must be pared to read like an encyclopedic entry, not an advert. Thanks, 99.136.254.88 (talk) 01:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cage Free Productions


A tag has been placed on Cage Free Productions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Patricia MacCormack
Hello Tfrosy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr. Patricia MacCormack for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Txtrooper (talk) 03:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)