User talk:Tfullwood

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian 20:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Regarding your edits to The Dinosaur and the Missing Link: A Prehistoric Tragedy:
Your recent edit to The Dinosaur and the Missing Link: A Prehistoric Tragedy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 15:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Disneyland
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Tiggerjay 19:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

disneyland map
Why would Disney want to keep copyright on an old map? See Ya', tfullwood 15:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Because they're Disney: see Mickey Mouse Protection Act. More to the point, Disney's motivation doesn't matter.  All that matters is whether or not they copyrighted it, and whether or not they renewed the copyright.  As the uploader, it's your job to determine that the image was either never copyrighted, or that the copyright has expired. --Carnildo 20:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The Dinosaur and the Missing Link: A Prehistoric Tragedy
Why did you undo my edit to this article? Did you not think that it improved it? It's customary on Wikipedia to add an edit summary to explain the edits that one makes. Smalljim 18:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I was thinking that, as more people come to the page, those smaller parts will improve and get bigger. See Ya', tfullwood 13:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, that's fine in principle, but...
 * (1) Trivia sections are not cool on Wikipedia (see Trivia sections), which is why I moved the information about Edison in your Trivia section into the main section.
 * (2) There's obviously no need for two separate sections ("Resources" and "External Links") both pointing to the same external references (YouTube, in this case).


 * I hope you agree that these are reasonable changes.


 * The only other small changes I made were (3) to add the approximate length of the film; (4) to remove the Animation category (one should always put articles in the most appropriate sub-category); and (5) to unlink the word flower - because linking to this does not materially add to the understanding of the article (see WP:OVERLINK).


 * I hope you agree that these are reasonable too. And just in case you're feeling any sense of ownership of this article, can I point you to what is written on each edit page:
 * "If you don't want your material to be edited mercilessly [ ...] by others, do not submit it."


 * Anyway, despite all the above, kudos to you for creating an article on an interesting old film that I wouldn't have otherwise come across!


 * Happy to discuss, but I'll reinstate my changes if you don't do so first, or provide any good reasons why I shouldn't, within a week.
 * Best wishes, Smalljim 19:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * As above, I've reverted back to my version. Do edit the article further (I think the Plot section could do with a bit of a rewrite, for instance), but please don't just undo this edit again, and don't forget to briefly explain your edits in the edit summary box. Cheers, Smalljim 17:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Tell that to the guy doing RCT3. No, seriosly.

AfD nomination of Theme Park Builder 3D
I have nominated Theme Park Builder 3D, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Theme Park Builder 3D. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Trusilver (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wonder World (RCT3 Park)
A tag has been placed on Wonder World (RCT3 Park), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ban Ray  16:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wonder World (RCT3 Park)
A tag has been placed on Wonder World (RCT3 Park), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 17:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wonder World (RCT3 Park)
A tag has been placed on Wonder World (RCT3 Park), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 17:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

User Warning(s)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 17:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted article
This page has been deleted 3 times in the last 5 minutes. Please stop recreating it or you may find yourself blocked. You should also check our policies on Notability. Exploding Boy (talk) 17:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Exploding Boy (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lego_island_comic.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lego_island_comic.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 10:12, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Legoislandmap.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Legoislandmap.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Legoislandpicnic.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Legoislandpicnic.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LEGO Island Bay.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:LEGO Island Bay.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

File:LEGO Island map.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LEGO Island map.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)